Comparison of Surface Current Measurement Between Compact and Square-Array Ocean Radar

High-frequency (HF) ocean radars have become essential tools for monitoring surface currents, offering real-time, wide-area coverage with cost-effectiveness. This study compares the compact CODAR system (MABT, 13 MHz) and the square-array phased-array radar (KNTN, 8 MHz) deployed at Cape Maobitou, Taiwan. Radial velocity measurements were evaluated against data from the Global Drifter Program (GDP), and a quality control (QC) mechanism was applied to improve the data’s reliability. The results indicated that KNTN provides broader spatial coverage, whereas MABT demonstrates higher precision in radial velocity measurements. Baseline velocity comparisons between MABT and KNTN revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.77 and a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 0.23 m/s, which are consistent with typical values reported in previous radar performance evaluations. Drifter-based velocity comparisons showed an initial correlation of 0.49, with an RMSD of 0.43 m/s. In more stable oceanic regions, the correlation improved to 0.81, with the RMSD decreasing to 0.24 m/s. To clarify, this study does not include multiple environmental scenarios but focuses on cases where both radar systems operated simultaneously and where surface drifter data were available within the overlapping area. Comparisons are thus limited by these spatiotemporal conditions. Radar data may still be affected by environmental or human factors, such as ionospheric variations, interference from radio frequency management issues, or inappropriate parameter settings, which could reduce the accuracy and consistency of the observations. International ocean observing programs have developed quality management procedures to enhance data reliability. In Taiwan, the Taiwan Ocean Research Institute (TORI) has established a data quality management mechanism based on international standards for data filtering, noise reduction, and outlier detection, improving the accuracy and stability of radar-derived velocity measurements.To eliminate the effects caused by different center frequencies between MABT and KNTN, this study used the same algorithms and parameter settings as much as possible in all steps, from Doppler spectra processing to radial velocity calculation, ensuring the comparability of the data. This study highlights the strengths and limitations of compact and phased-array HF radar systems based on co-observed cases under consistent operational conditions. Future research should explore multi-frequency radar integration to enhance spatial coverage and measurement precision, improving real-time coastal current monitoring and operational forecasting.