Verification of the Shafranov shift in free-boundary VMEC, DESC, and SPEC calculations with elliptical geometry

Given a set of current-carrying filaments that create a magnetic field with rotating elliptical flux surfaces, we present verification calculations using the VMEC, DESC, and SPEC free-boundary magnetohydrostatic equilibrium codes for both the “vacuum” equilibrium, for which there is no plasma pressure and no plasma currents, and for a non-zero pressure, zero toroidal current equilibrium. For the vacuum case, these codes are quantitatively compared to the magnetic field produced by the coils. For the non-zero pressure case, they are compared to each other. As the stepped pressure profile used in SPEC approaches the continuous profile used in VMEC and DESC, the SPEC magnetic axis approaches the VMEC and DESC axes. To within an error given by the difference between the pressure profiles, the VMEC, DESC, and SPEC calculations give the same pressure-induced geometric shift of the magnetic axis, known as the Shafranov shift.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0253843
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of the Shafranov shift in free-boundary VMEC, DESC, and SPEC calculations with elliptical geometry

S. R. Hudson, A. Baillod, Dario Panici, M. Cianciosa et al.
1 citations
Physics of Plasmas
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
article

Verification of the Shafranov shift in free-boundary VMEC, DESC, and SPEC calculations with elliptical geometry

S. R. Hudson, A. Baillod, Dario Panici, M. Cianciosa, A. S. Ware, Caoxiang Zhu, Gabriel S. Woodbury Saudeau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Given a set of current-carrying filaments that create a magnetic field with rotating elliptical flux surfaces, we present verification calculations using the VMEC, DESC, and SPEC free-boundary magnetohydrostatic equilibrium codes for both the “vacuum” equilibrium, for which there is no plasma pressure and no plasma currents, and for a non-zero pressure, zero toroidal current equilibrium. For the vacuum case, these codes are quantitatively compared to the magnetic field produced by the coils. For the non-zero pressure case, they are compared to each other. As the stepped pressure profile used in SPEC approaches the continuous profile used in VMEC and DESC, the SPEC magnetic axis approaches the VMEC and DESC axes. To within an error given by the difference between the pressure profiles, the VMEC, DESC, and SPEC calculations give the same pressure-induced geometric shift of the magnetic axis, known as the Shafranov shift.

Physics of PlasmasVol. 32(4)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (US), University of Montana (US), Columbia University (US), Auburn University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Simons Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Verification of the Shafranov shift in free-boundary VMEC, DESC, and SPEC calculations with elliptical geometry — S. R. Hudson, A. Baillod, et al. · Physics of Plasmas (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS