Reducing complexity in building design standards using network analysis - Case study: Structural design standard ISO 22156

The utility and complexity of building design standards is a growing concern amongst construction professionals. Standards for emerging and non-conventional materials and technologies are developing rapidly in response to market and societal pressures. As design standards swell with updates, ensuring all requirements are satisfied becomes increasingly complex for users, potentially effecting design safety or slowing standard adoption. This study applies network analysis to assess navigational complexity in a developing standard. The authors assume complexity to broadly mean the inability of the standard to effectively meet the users' needs. A case study is presented of the International Standard Organization (ISO) 22156 bamboo structural design standard. The standard's networks from the initial intent-signifying version of the standard (ISO 22156:2004) and the recent technical revision and reorganization (ISO 22156:2021) are analysed assuming that forward flow improves the user experience and reduces complexity. Evidence of complexity are identified from each networks' fundamental features, centrality metrics , clustering tendencies, recurring motifs, and geodesic paths. Guidance and specific interventions are proposed to reduce navigational complexity and allow for continued growth in future editions of ISO 22156:2021. • Reducing complexity in building design standards is necessary. • Case study of ISO 22156 full-culm bamboo structural design standard. • Network analysis demonstrated as means of assessing navigational complexity. • Interventions to reduce navigational complexity proposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112635
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing complexity in building design standards using network analysis - Case study: Structural design standard ISO 22156

Kent A. Harries, C. F. Rogers
Journal of Building Engineering
Design Education and Practice
article

Reducing complexity in building design standards using network analysis - Case study: Structural design standard ISO 22156

Kent A. Harries, C. F. Rogers
article en

Abstract

The utility and complexity of building design standards is a growing concern amongst construction professionals. Standards for emerging and non-conventional materials and technologies are developing rapidly in response to market and societal pressures. As design standards swell with updates, ensuring all requirements are satisfied becomes increasingly complex for users, potentially effecting design safety or slowing standard adoption. This study applies network analysis to assess navigational complexity in a developing standard. The authors assume complexity to broadly mean the inability of the standard to effectively meet the users' needs. A case study is presented of the International Standard Organization (ISO) 22156 bamboo structural design standard. The standard's networks from the initial intent-signifying version of the standard (ISO 22156:2004) and the recent technical revision and reorganization (ISO 22156:2021) are analysed assuming that forward flow improves the user experience and reduces complexity. Evidence of complexity are identified from each networks' fundamental features, centrality metrics , clustering tendencies, recurring motifs, and geodesic paths. Guidance and specific interventions are proposed to reduce navigational complexity and allow for continued growth in future editions of ISO 22156:2021. • Reducing complexity in building design standards is necessary. • Case study of ISO 22156 full-culm bamboo structural design standard. • Network analysis demonstrated as means of assessing navigational complexity. • Interventions to reduce navigational complexity proposed.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 107
University of Pittsburgh (US), Hermitage Museum (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.