Assisted Suicide for Irreversible Patients on Life Support? The Intricate Italian Journey Towards Conforming with the Legislation of Spain, Austria, and Portugal

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: In 2019, the Italian Constitutional Court (ICC) stated that the principles of equality, dignity, and self-determination enshrined in the constitution require that assisted suicide be considered lawful under certain conditions, including that the patient is kept alive through life-sustaining treatments. In fact, since such patients could already die by refusing treatment, assisted suicide is ethical as it allows them to die more quickly and with dignity. The paper aims to analyze the requirement of life-sustaining treatments from a legal and comparative perspective. <b>Methods</b>: The authors performed the search on Italian legal databases as well as on Scopus and PubMed and by comparing Italian regulations with those of Spain, Portugal, and Austria, which are similar to the Italian one in their fundamentally restrictive nature. The authors have delved into the Italian legal system through an analytical method of interpretation of the normative texts and used the comparative method to investigate which of the legal systems considered is more permissive. <b>Results</b>: According to the ICC, continuing to prohibit assisted suicide for patients who do not require life-sustaining treatments is not discriminatory: these patients cannot be equated with others, as only in the former case does refusing treatment lead to death. From its personalist ethical framework, the ICC also rejected the claim that the patient's self-determination is being infringed upon: self-determination must be balanced with the protection of life, which is a fundamental value. However, in 2024, the ICC clarified that life-sustaining treatments are not limited to those directly supporting vital functions through medical machines, but also include all treatments without which the person would die in a short time, such as manual bowel evacuation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The current Italian regulation seems inconsistent. It would be preferable to regulate assisted suicide by referencing the models of Spain, Portugal, and Austria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080885
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assisted Suicide for Irreversible Patients on Life Support? The Intricate Italian Journey Towards Conforming with the Legislation of Spain, Austria, and Portugal

Simona Zaami, Nicola Di Fazio, Susanna Marinelli, Paola Frati et al.
Healthcare
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Assisted Suicide for Irreversible Patients on Life Support? The Intricate Italian Journey Towards Conforming with the Legislation of Spain, Austria, and Portugal

Simona Zaami, Nicola Di Fazio, Susanna Marinelli, Paola Frati, Gianluca Montanari Vergallo
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: In 2019, the Italian Constitutional Court (ICC) stated that the principles of equality, dignity, and self-determination enshrined in the constitution require that assisted suicide be considered lawful under certain conditions, including that the patient is kept alive through life-sustaining treatments. In fact, since such patients could already die by refusing treatment, assisted suicide is ethical as it allows them to die more quickly and with dignity. The paper aims to analyze the requirement of life-sustaining treatments from a legal and comparative perspective. <b>Methods</b>: The authors performed the search on Italian legal databases as well as on Scopus and PubMed and by comparing Italian regulations with those of Spain, Portugal, and Austria, which are similar to the Italian one in their fundamentally restrictive nature. The authors have delved into the Italian legal system through an analytical method of interpretation of the normative texts and used the comparative method to investigate which of the legal systems considered is more permissive. <b>Results</b>: According to the ICC, continuing to prohibit assisted suicide for patients who do not require life-sustaining treatments is not discriminatory: these patients cannot be equated with others, as only in the former case does refusing treatment lead to death. From its personalist ethical framework, the ICC also rejected the claim that the patient's self-determination is being infringed upon: self-determination must be balanced with the protection of life, which is a fundamental value. However, in 2024, the ICC clarified that life-sustaining treatments are not limited to those directly supporting vital functions through medical machines, but also include all treatments without which the person would die in a short time, such as manual bowel evacuation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The current Italian regulation seems inconsistent. It would be preferable to regulate assisted suicide by referencing the models of Spain, Portugal, and Austria.

HealthcareVol. 13(8)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Link Campus University (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.