Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Fake News Detection on Twitter

The rapid growth of online platforms has resulted in an increase in the spread of fake news, causing significant social harm. This study examines machine learning and deep learning methods for detecting fake news across a number of datasets. Logistic Regression, Random Forest, LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and a Continuous Attention Mechanism Embedded Bi-LSTM (CAME) were evaluated for their performance on a Twitter dataset. The exponential rise of internet platforms has caused an upsurge in the propagation of fake news, causing immense social harm. This study examines machine learning and deep learning methods for detecting fake news across a number of datasets, achieving accuracy levels up to 79%. Logistic Regression produced an 81% accuracy with precisions of 0.80 with class 0 and 0.82 of class 1. Random Forest obtained 79% accuracy with precise of 0.77 with class 0 as 0.82 of class 1. The LSTM model achieved 76.43% accuracy with peak training accuracy of 91.33%, Bi-LSTM achieved 77.68% accuracy with peak training accuracy of 91.73%, and the CAME model achieved 79.05% accuracy with peak training accuracy of 91.95%.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i34s.5909
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Fake News Detection on Twitter

A. S. Arya
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Fake News Detection on Twitter

A. S. Arya
article en

Abstract

The rapid growth of online platforms has resulted in an increase in the spread of fake news, causing significant social harm. This study examines machine learning and deep learning methods for detecting fake news across a number of datasets. Logistic Regression, Random Forest, LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and a Continuous Attention Mechanism Embedded Bi-LSTM (CAME) were evaluated for their performance on a Twitter dataset. The exponential rise of internet platforms has caused an upsurge in the propagation of fake news, causing immense social harm. This study examines machine learning and deep learning methods for detecting fake news across a number of datasets, achieving accuracy levels up to 79%. Logistic Regression produced an 81% accuracy with precisions of 0.80 with class 0 and 0.82 of class 1. Random Forest obtained 79% accuracy with precise of 0.77 with class 0 as 0.82 of class 1. The LSTM model achieved 76.43% accuracy with peak training accuracy of 91.33%, Bi-LSTM achieved 77.68% accuracy with peak training accuracy of 91.73%, and the CAME model achieved 79.05% accuracy with peak training accuracy of 91.95%.

Journal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementVol. 10(34s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.