University Opinion Measurement Centers: Scientific Neutrality in the Face of Political and Commercial Marketing

This study investigates the role of university-based opinion poll centers in analyzing public opinion and their relationship with governmental bodies. Using a qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven professors from leading Jordanian universities, selected based on their expertise in public policy, social research, and media studies. A thematic analysis approach was applied to extract patterns in the responses, categorizing themes such as institutional challenges, funding constraints, and political influences on data neutrality. The findings indicate that while these centers hold significant potential in shaping policy discourse, they face structural limitations including inadequate governmental support, limited financial resources, and challenges in sustaining academic independence. The study concludes that greater collaboration between universities and international research bodies is essential to strengthening the credibility and impact of opinion polling centers in the Arab world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i35s.6043
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Opinion Measurement Centers: Scientific Neutrality in the Face of Political and Commercial Marketing

Hanan Al Sheikh
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

University Opinion Measurement Centers: Scientific Neutrality in the Face of Political and Commercial Marketing

Hanan Al Sheikh
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the role of university-based opinion poll centers in analyzing public opinion and their relationship with governmental bodies. Using a qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven professors from leading Jordanian universities, selected based on their expertise in public policy, social research, and media studies. A thematic analysis approach was applied to extract patterns in the responses, categorizing themes such as institutional challenges, funding constraints, and political influences on data neutrality. The findings indicate that while these centers hold significant potential in shaping policy discourse, they face structural limitations including inadequate governmental support, limited financial resources, and challenges in sustaining academic independence. The study concludes that greater collaboration between universities and international research bodies is essential to strengthening the credibility and impact of opinion polling centers in the Arab world.

Journal of Information Systems Engineering & ManagementVol. 10(35s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

University Opinion Measurement Centers: Scientific Neutrality in the Face of Political and Commercial Marketing — Hanan Al Sheikh · Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS