Cost and Efficiency of Drug‐Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Endoscopy Suite Versus Outpatient Surgery Center

ABSTRACT Objective Drug‐induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used to identify airway obstruction patterns in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This procedure is typically performed in either the traditional operating room (OR) or an outpatient surgery center (SC). There is limited data regarding the cost and efficiency of DISE in the endoscopy suite (ES). This study compares the cost, efficiency, and safety of DISE performed in the ES compared to the SC. Methods This retrospective review included patients who underwent DISE between July 2023 and April 2024 at a single tertiary care center. Consecutive patients with CPAP‐intolerant OSA undergoing DISE in the ES or SC were included. Patient demographics, sleep studies, procedure‐related costs, procedure duration characteristics, and anesthesia documentation were analyzed. Results Eighty‐four patients (36 ES, 48 SC) were included. Patient sex, age, BMI, and preoperative AHI/REI were similar in both cohorts ( p > 0.05). DISE in the ES significantly reduced total facility time (48 min, p < 0.0001), time in procedure room (6.6 min, p < 0.0001), DISE procedure time (1.7 min, p = 0.0034), total recovery time (30.4 min, p < 0.0001), and procedure room turnover time (7.1 min, p = 0.0012). Costs for ES procedures were 39.35% lower, specifically in costs associated with anesthesia, operating room, and recovery room (all comparisons, p < 0.001). No complications occurred in either group. Conclusions Performing DISE in the ES increases efficiency and reduces costs compared to the outpatient SC while maintaining safety for patients with CPAP‐intolerant OSA. Level of Evidence 3

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32183
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost and Efficiency of Drug‐Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Endoscopy Suite Versus Outpatient Surgery Center

Andrew M. Corr, Colin T. Huntley, Patrick Hunt, Elliott M. Sina et al.
3 citations
The Laryngoscope
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
3.49
article

Cost and Efficiency of Drug‐Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Endoscopy Suite Versus Outpatient Surgery Center

Andrew M. Corr, Colin T. Huntley, Patrick Hunt, Elliott M. Sina, Maurits S. Boon, Leonard E. Estephan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Drug‐induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used to identify airway obstruction patterns in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This procedure is typically performed in either the traditional operating room (OR) or an outpatient surgery center (SC). There is limited data regarding the cost and efficiency of DISE in the endoscopy suite (ES). This study compares the cost, efficiency, and safety of DISE performed in the ES compared to the SC. Methods This retrospective review included patients who underwent DISE between July 2023 and April 2024 at a single tertiary care center. Consecutive patients with CPAP‐intolerant OSA undergoing DISE in the ES or SC were included. Patient demographics, sleep studies, procedure‐related costs, procedure duration characteristics, and anesthesia documentation were analyzed. Results Eighty‐four patients (36 ES, 48 SC) were included. Patient sex, age, BMI, and preoperative AHI/REI were similar in both cohorts ( p > 0.05). DISE in the ES significantly reduced total facility time (48 min, p < 0.0001), time in procedure room (6.6 min, p < 0.0001), DISE procedure time (1.7 min, p = 0.0034), total recovery time (30.4 min, p < 0.0001), and procedure room turnover time (7.1 min, p = 0.0012). Costs for ES procedures were 39.35% lower, specifically in costs associated with anesthesia, operating room, and recovery room (all comparisons, p < 0.001). No complications occurred in either group. Conclusions Performing DISE in the ES increases efficiency and reduces costs compared to the outpatient SC while maintaining safety for patients with CPAP‐intolerant OSA. Level of Evidence 3

The LaryngoscopeVol. 135(10)
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Jefferson University Hospitals (US)
Thomas Jefferson University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.