Role of Body Fat and Metabolic Rate in Site-Specific Fracture Risk: A 20-Year Taiwanese Cohort Study

BACKGROUND Osteoporotic fractures are a significant public health problem, yet traditional risk assessment methods have limitations. This retrospective study used the integrated Healthcare information (iHi) Data Platform of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) (2000-2020) to evaluate associations between body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), body fat percentage (BFP), basal metabolic rate (BMR), and site-specific fracture risk in 9583 Taiwanese individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS We extracted DXA-measured BMD, BMI, BFP, and BMR data from CMUH's iHi Platform. Fracture events were identified using ICD-9/10 codes and verified through radiology reports. Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated fracture risk, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Mediation analysis quantified the contributions of BFP and BMR to the BMI-fracture relationship. RESULTS During median follow-up of 8.7 years, 1672 fractures (17.4%) occurred. Individuals with normal BMD showed an 82% lower fracture risk compared to those with osteoporosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.18, 95% CI: 0.15-0.22, p<0.001). Normal BFP significantly reduced fracture risk by 77% versus low BFP (aHR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.72, p=0.012). Higher BMR was consistently protective, with aHR=0.54 (95% CI: 0.36-0.82, p=0.004) for BMR ≥1500 versus BMR<1000. While underweight increased fracture risk (aHR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.29-2.36, p<0.001), obesity conferred no significant protection (aHR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.89-1.21, p=0.58). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that fracture risk assessment should incorporate BFP and BMR alongside BMD and BMI. The "BMI paradox" was explained through mediation analysis, revealing BFP and BMR as critical intermediaries accounting for 50% and 32% of the BMI-fracture relationship, respectively. These findings support developing ethnicity-specific fracture risk models integrating body composition metrics for more precise risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Monitor
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.947660
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Body Fat and Metabolic Rate in Site-Specific Fracture Risk: A 20-Year Taiwanese Cohort Study

Cheng‐Hao Tu, Hei-Tung Yip, Jung-Ju Lin, Yu-Hsiang Lin et al.
1 citations
Medical Science Monitor
Hip and Femur Fractures
2.01
article

Role of Body Fat and Metabolic Rate in Site-Specific Fracture Risk: A 20-Year Taiwanese Cohort Study

Cheng‐Hao Tu, Hei-Tung Yip, Jung-Ju Lin, Yu-Hsiang Lin, XianXiu Chen, Chun-Hao Tsai, Der-Cherng Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Osteoporotic fractures are a significant public health problem, yet traditional risk assessment methods have limitations. This retrospective study used the integrated Healthcare information (iHi) Data Platform of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) (2000-2020) to evaluate associations between body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), body fat percentage (BFP), basal metabolic rate (BMR), and site-specific fracture risk in 9583 Taiwanese individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS We extracted DXA-measured BMD, BMI, BFP, and BMR data from CMUH's iHi Platform. Fracture events were identified using ICD-9/10 codes and verified through radiology reports. Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated fracture risk, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Mediation analysis quantified the contributions of BFP and BMR to the BMI-fracture relationship. RESULTS During median follow-up of 8.7 years, 1672 fractures (17.4%) occurred. Individuals with normal BMD showed an 82% lower fracture risk compared to those with osteoporosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.18, 95% CI: 0.15-0.22, p<0.001). Normal BFP significantly reduced fracture risk by 77% versus low BFP (aHR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.72, p=0.012). Higher BMR was consistently protective, with aHR=0.54 (95% CI: 0.36-0.82, p=0.004) for BMR ≥1500 versus BMR<1000. While underweight increased fracture risk (aHR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.29-2.36, p<0.001), obesity conferred no significant protection (aHR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.89-1.21, p=0.58). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that fracture risk assessment should incorporate BFP and BMR alongside BMD and BMI. The "BMI paradox" was explained through mediation analysis, revealing BFP and BMR as critical intermediaries accounting for 50% and 32% of the BMI-fracture relationship, respectively. These findings support developing ethnicity-specific fracture risk models integrating body composition metrics for more precise risk stratification.

Medical Science MonitorVol. 31
China Medical University (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW)
China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Division of Materials Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hip and Femur Fractures
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.