Predictive modeling of the mechanical behavior of 3D-printed polylactic acid/wood composite: Comparison of GEP and ANN methods

This study introduces a novel approach for predicting the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polylactic acid wood composites using gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural networks (ANN) modeling methods. Addressing the challenge of determining optimal process parameters in fused deposition modeling of natural fiber composites, experiments were designed using Taguchi’s L27 orthogonal array. Five key parameters were analyzed: layer thickness (100–300 μm), printing speed (40–90 mm/s), raster angle (0°–90°), infill density (35%–95%), and nozzle temperature (200–220 °C). ANOVA results identified raster angle as the most influential factor, contributing 38.36% and 26% to tensile and compressive strengths, respectively. Subsequently, a comparative statistical analysis evaluated the predictive accuracy of GEP and ANN. The GEP model exhibited superior performance, achieving validation errors between 0.04% and 0.82%, outperforming ANN (0.34%–5.31%). These findings provide a robust framework for enhancing the mechanical performance of sustainable 3D-printed composites, enabling more efficient and reliable production processes in additive manufacturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0268653
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive modeling of the mechanical behavior of 3D-printed polylactic acid/wood composite: Comparison of GEP and ANN methods

Abinash Mahapatro, Priyaranjan Samal, Valentin Romanovski, Abhijit Bhowmik et al.
7 citations
AIP Advances
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.78
article

Predictive modeling of the mechanical behavior of 3D-printed polylactic acid/wood composite: Comparison of GEP and ANN methods

Abinash Mahapatro, Priyaranjan Samal, Valentin Romanovski, Abhijit Bhowmik, Raman Kumar, Abdulaziz Alhazaa, M K Ranganathaswamy, Yogesh Kumar, A. Johnson Santhosh
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study introduces a novel approach for predicting the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polylactic acid wood composites using gene expression programming (GEP) and artificial neural networks (ANN) modeling methods. Addressing the challenge of determining optimal process parameters in fused deposition modeling of natural fiber composites, experiments were designed using Taguchi’s L27 orthogonal array. Five key parameters were analyzed: layer thickness (100–300 μm), printing speed (40–90 mm/s), raster angle (0°–90°), infill density (35%–95%), and nozzle temperature (200–220 °C). ANOVA results identified raster angle as the most influential factor, contributing 38.36% and 26% to tensile and compressive strengths, respectively. Subsequently, a comparative statistical analysis evaluated the predictive accuracy of GEP and ANN. The GEP model exhibited superior performance, achieving validation errors between 0.04% and 0.82%, outperforming ANN (0.34%–5.31%). These findings provide a robust framework for enhancing the mechanical performance of sustainable 3D-printed composites, enabling more efficient and reliable production processes in additive manufacturing.

AIP AdvancesVol. 15(4)
Jain University (IN), Jimma University (ET), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Rayat Bahra University (IN), King Saud University (SA), Institute of Engineering (NP), Interface (United Kingdom) (GB), Sohar University (OM), University of Virginia (US), Chitkara University (IN), Saveetha University (IN), Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
4.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.