Model uncertainties of concrete cracking resistance models based on probabilistic simulations

In the paper, the probabilistic assessment of cracking resistance of concrete flexural members is presented.The aim of the performed analysis was to verify an alternative formula for cracking resistance calculation and to compare the proposed method with two standard methods.The experimental investigation performed at Lublin University of technology was used to verify the design models.The accuracy and reliability of the calculation methods was assessed by analyzing the model uncertainty .When model uncertainty > 1.0 the prediction model yields a lower value of cracking resistance and is thus conservative, while a value of < 1.0 implies that the prediction model yields higher cracking resistance than is actually available in the structure and is thus unconservative.A high model uncertainty = 1.53 was found when the cracking resistance was calculated by standard method assuming a linear distribution of normal stresses over the cross section and taking the maximum tensile stress as the concrete axial tensile strength.When applying the flexural tensile concrete strength defined in Eurocode 2 instead of axial tensile strength in a cracking resistance formula, the model uncertainty decreased to = 1.15 but the model was still conservative.The best prediction of cracking resistance was obtained for the proposed method in which the influence of a size effect and fracture properties of concrete on cracking moment were included.In this case the model uncertainty was close to 1.0 ( = 0.94) with a relatively small scatter.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21012/fc12.1378
Primary Topic
Concrete Properties and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model uncertainties of concrete cracking resistance models based on probabilistic simulations

Marta Słowik, David Lehký, Drahomír Novák, Izabela Maria Skrzypczak
Concrete Properties and Behavior
article

Model uncertainties of concrete cracking resistance models based on probabilistic simulations

Marta Słowik, David Lehký, Drahomír Novák, Izabela Maria Skrzypczak
article en

Abstract

In the paper, the probabilistic assessment of cracking resistance of concrete flexural members is presented.The aim of the performed analysis was to verify an alternative formula for cracking resistance calculation and to compare the proposed method with two standard methods.The experimental investigation performed at Lublin University of technology was used to verify the design models.The accuracy and reliability of the calculation methods was assessed by analyzing the model uncertainty .When model uncertainty > 1.0 the prediction model yields a lower value of cracking resistance and is thus conservative, while a value of < 1.0 implies that the prediction model yields higher cracking resistance than is actually available in the structure and is thus unconservative.A high model uncertainty = 1.53 was found when the cracking resistance was calculated by standard method assuming a linear distribution of normal stresses over the cross section and taking the maximum tensile stress as the concrete axial tensile strength.When applying the flexural tensile concrete strength defined in Eurocode 2 instead of axial tensile strength in a cracking resistance formula, the model uncertainty decreased to = 1.15 but the model was still conservative.The best prediction of cracking resistance was obtained for the proposed method in which the influence of a size effect and fracture properties of concrete on cracking moment were included.In this case the model uncertainty was close to 1.0 ( = 0.94) with a relatively small scatter.

Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Concrete Properties and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.