Global droughts in a warming climate: Evaluation of SPI and SPEI under 1.5 , 2 , and 3 C global warming

• Meteorological droughts compared using observations and CMIP6 GCMs. • GCMs show high bias in regions with strong historic drought characteristics. • SPEI with evapotranspiration shows larger increases than SPI in future scenarios. • Future droughts show larger increases in arid regions globally. Accurately predicting droughts, amidst rapid global warming, is crucial for effective resource management and policy development. Here, we employ CMIP6 models to analyze historical and future global meteorological drought patterns using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation and Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). We first assess model efficacy against historical observations (1951–2014) and then project changes at key IPCC warming thresholds. Our evaluation shows that even though CMIP6 models accurately capture global average drought characteristics, significant biases emerge in regions that commonly experience extreme historical drought conditions. Projections indicate increasing drought duration, frequency, and severity, particularly under higher warming scenarios. A more pronounced increase is noted with SPEI compared to SPI: under a 3 °C warming, drought severity is projected to increase across 91.8 % of land grids, based on SPEI, as opposed to 28.2 % for SPI. Similarly, increases in drought frequency are projected over 86.5 % (SPEI) versus 33.4 % (SPI), and increases in duration in 74.9 % (SPEI) versus 12.9 % (SPI) of land grids. This discrepancy highlights the importance of including temperature, through evapotranspiration, in drought assessments, especially because of the expected increase in evaporative demand driven by rising temperature. Our analysis further demonstrates that whereas humid and transitional areas may experience reduced drought severity and duration as per SPI, SPEI predicts a significant worsening of drought events in the future. On the other hand, both indicators project a worsening of drought conditions in arid regions—changes in SPI are small but that with SPEI are in the order of 2–3 months in duration, 3.5–4 events in frequency, and 4.3–5.2 units in severity. This study underscores the complexity of future drought patterns, which necessitates a range of strategies for mitigation and adaptation to safeguard against escalating drought risks in a warming world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133309
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
32.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global droughts in a warming climate: Evaluation of SPI and SPEI under 1.5 , 2 , and 3 C global warming

Kunal Bhardwaj, C. Prakash Khedun, Ashok Mishra
29 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
32.05
article

Global droughts in a warming climate: Evaluation of SPI and SPEI under 1.5 , 2 , and 3 C global warming

Kunal Bhardwaj, C. Prakash Khedun, Ashok Mishra
article en
29 citations

Abstract

• Meteorological droughts compared using observations and CMIP6 GCMs. • GCMs show high bias in regions with strong historic drought characteristics. • SPEI with evapotranspiration shows larger increases than SPI in future scenarios. • Future droughts show larger increases in arid regions globally. Accurately predicting droughts, amidst rapid global warming, is crucial for effective resource management and policy development. Here, we employ CMIP6 models to analyze historical and future global meteorological drought patterns using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation and Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). We first assess model efficacy against historical observations (1951–2014) and then project changes at key IPCC warming thresholds. Our evaluation shows that even though CMIP6 models accurately capture global average drought characteristics, significant biases emerge in regions that commonly experience extreme historical drought conditions. Projections indicate increasing drought duration, frequency, and severity, particularly under higher warming scenarios. A more pronounced increase is noted with SPEI compared to SPI: under a 3 °C warming, drought severity is projected to increase across 91.8 % of land grids, based on SPEI, as opposed to 28.2 % for SPI. Similarly, increases in drought frequency are projected over 86.5 % (SPEI) versus 33.4 % (SPI), and increases in duration in 74.9 % (SPEI) versus 12.9 % (SPI) of land grids. This discrepancy highlights the importance of including temperature, through evapotranspiration, in drought assessments, especially because of the expected increase in evaporative demand driven by rising temperature. Our analysis further demonstrates that whereas humid and transitional areas may experience reduced drought severity and duration as per SPI, SPEI predicts a significant worsening of drought events in the future. On the other hand, both indicators project a worsening of drought conditions in arid regions—changes in SPI are small but that with SPEI are in the order of 2–3 months in duration, 3.5–4 events in frequency, and 4.3–5.2 units in severity. This study underscores the complexity of future drought patterns, which necessitates a range of strategies for mitigation and adaptation to safeguard against escalating drought risks in a warming world.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 659
Clemson University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
32.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.