Socio-technical feasibility of coal transitions in India: Results from stakeholder interviews

• Coal will take at least a generation to phasedown in India as per stakeholders. • Renewables have become competitive with coal but costs of system integration must be estimated. • Stakeholders reveal support for CO 2 utilization but concerns about CO 2 storage. • Need for just transitions is emphasized for workers, potentially with reskilling. Strategizing development-led energy transitions for India would need considerable stakeholder inputs for improved decision-making. While modeling exercises have largely been used for research and policymaking, an increasing need is felt to validate underlying assumptions and model findings based on views of important stakeholders. Particularly, for the coal sector, these stakeholders are present throughout the value chain: mining, end-use (power and industry), regulatory agencies, transport and advocacy. This paper summarizes the key findings of our interviews with n = 21 stakeholders across these sectors focusing on evolving coal use, underlying technologies and socio-technical features of this transition. Based on this exercise, interviewed experts largely believe that coal use would continue for the next two decades in the interest of energy security and energy affordability to the consumer. At the same time, they also acknowledged the reduced costs of solar, which makes it a key player in the analysis. We also notice an improved perception of carbon management technologies. Particularly, CO 2 utilization to produce methanol and urea are seen as potential winners as these approaches could facilitate lower imports of petroleum and natural gas products. Geologic CO 2 storage is still somewhat impeded by technical limitations and lack of global exemplars. Other approaches such as recovery of methane from gassy coal mines and biomass co-firing are seen as important but limited in potential. Most stakeholders also pointed to the need for averting job losses in the coal value-chain, which may not necessarily be made up by renewables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Climate Change
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100188
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-technical feasibility of coal transitions in India: Results from stakeholder interviews

Udayan Singh, Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan, Amit Garg, Srinath Haran Iyer et al.
1 citations
Energy and Climate Change
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.50
article

Socio-technical feasibility of coal transitions in India: Results from stakeholder interviews

Udayan Singh, Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan, Amit Garg, Srinath Haran Iyer, Ajay Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Coal will take at least a generation to phasedown in India as per stakeholders. • Renewables have become competitive with coal but costs of system integration must be estimated. • Stakeholders reveal support for CO 2 utilization but concerns about CO 2 storage. • Need for just transitions is emphasized for workers, potentially with reskilling. Strategizing development-led energy transitions for India would need considerable stakeholder inputs for improved decision-making. While modeling exercises have largely been used for research and policymaking, an increasing need is felt to validate underlying assumptions and model findings based on views of important stakeholders. Particularly, for the coal sector, these stakeholders are present throughout the value chain: mining, end-use (power and industry), regulatory agencies, transport and advocacy. This paper summarizes the key findings of our interviews with n = 21 stakeholders across these sectors focusing on evolving coal use, underlying technologies and socio-technical features of this transition. Based on this exercise, interviewed experts largely believe that coal use would continue for the next two decades in the interest of energy security and energy affordability to the consumer. At the same time, they also acknowledged the reduced costs of solar, which makes it a key player in the analysis. We also notice an improved perception of carbon management technologies. Particularly, CO 2 utilization to produce methanol and urea are seen as potential winners as these approaches could facilitate lower imports of petroleum and natural gas products. Geologic CO 2 storage is still somewhat impeded by technical limitations and lack of global exemplars. Other approaches such as recovery of methane from gassy coal mines and biomass co-firing are seen as important but limited in potential. Most stakeholders also pointed to the need for averting job losses in the coal value-chain, which may not necessarily be made up by renewables.

Energy and Climate ChangeVol. 6
Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IN), Kyoto University (JP), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Kyoto Katsura Hospital (JP)
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.