Administrative monopoly regulation and the cost of debt financing: Evidence from China

Traditional antitrust research has primarily focused on the market-based monopoly, while less attention given to those formed by administrative power. This study explores how the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) in China, designed to curb administrative monopoly, influences corporate debt financing costs. We find that administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. Enhanced accounting information quality and lower corporate default risk are two possible channels. The main effect is more pronounced among private firms, small-sized and medium-sized firms, and firms in regions with lower degree of financial marketization. The FCRS also aids in addressing the issue of “zombie firms”, mitigating their crowding-out effect on the debt financing of normal firms. Moreover, the cost of debt financing decreases more when the review measures include both stringent self-inspection and external supervision. These findings underscore the importance of administrative monopoly regulation and contribute to the advancement of antitrust endeavors in the Asia-Pacific region. • This paper focuses on the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) implemented in China. • Administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. • The advancement of antitrust endeavors is important in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102777
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Administrative monopoly regulation and the cost of debt financing: Evidence from China

Xiaoran Ni, Shuxun Cai
5 citations
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
11.04
article

Administrative monopoly regulation and the cost of debt financing: Evidence from China

Xiaoran Ni, Shuxun Cai
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Traditional antitrust research has primarily focused on the market-based monopoly, while less attention given to those formed by administrative power. This study explores how the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) in China, designed to curb administrative monopoly, influences corporate debt financing costs. We find that administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. Enhanced accounting information quality and lower corporate default risk are two possible channels. The main effect is more pronounced among private firms, small-sized and medium-sized firms, and firms in regions with lower degree of financial marketization. The FCRS also aids in addressing the issue of “zombie firms”, mitigating their crowding-out effect on the debt financing of normal firms. Moreover, the cost of debt financing decreases more when the review measures include both stringent self-inspection and external supervision. These findings underscore the importance of administrative monopoly regulation and contribute to the advancement of antitrust endeavors in the Asia-Pacific region. • This paper focuses on the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) implemented in China. • Administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. • The advancement of antitrust endeavors is important in the Asia-Pacific region.

Pacific-Basin Finance JournalVol. 92
Xiamen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
11.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.