Administrative monopoly regulation and the cost of debt financing: Evidence from China
Traditional antitrust research has primarily focused on the market-based monopoly, while less attention given to those formed by administrative power. This study explores how the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) in China, designed to curb administrative monopoly, influences corporate debt financing costs. We find that administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. Enhanced accounting information quality and lower corporate default risk are two possible channels. The main effect is more pronounced among private firms, small-sized and medium-sized firms, and firms in regions with lower degree of financial marketization. The FCRS also aids in addressing the issue of “zombie firms”, mitigating their crowding-out effect on the debt financing of normal firms. Moreover, the cost of debt financing decreases more when the review measures include both stringent self-inspection and external supervision. These findings underscore the importance of administrative monopoly regulation and contribute to the advancement of antitrust endeavors in the Asia-Pacific region. • This paper focuses on the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) implemented in China. • Administrative monopoly regulation reduces the cost of debt financing. • The advancement of antitrust endeavors is important in the Asia-Pacific region.
Authors
- Xiaoran Ni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-0072)
- Shuxun Cai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-8836)
Institutions
- Xiamen University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
- Published
- 2025-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102777
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 11.04