Modifications in pedaling kinematics, saddle pressures and comfort in elite cyclists after alterations in saddle height during ventilatory thresholds

Clear evidence is lacking in cycling biomechanics research regarding the effects of pedaling at various saddle heights (SH) and intensities, hindering full comprehension of bicycle geometry configurations and their impacts on performance and potential injuries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of changes in SH (freely chosen, +2%, and -2%) at two intensities (First (VT1) and second (VT2) ventilatory threshold) on the pressures exerted on the saddle, the lower-limb kinematics, and perceived comfort. Twenty-four elite cyclists pedaled for 6 min on an ergometer at each of the saddle heights and intensities. The results of the kinematics showed differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) as a function of the SH in all the variables analyzed. The results of the saddle pressures showed an interaction between SH and saddle zones (<i>p</i> < 0.01) depending on intensity (<i>p</i> = 0.002). There were higher levels of overall perceived comfort in freely chosen SH. In conclusion, higher SH (+2%) produced greater pressures on the saddle, greater extension in the lower extremities, and less comfort for the cyclist. Regarding intensities, VT2 reduces the pressures exerted on the saddle, leading to increased ankle dorsiflexion and decreased hip flexion-extension which negatively impacts cyclist comfort when not pedaling at freely chosen SH.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2493010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modifications in pedaling kinematics, saddle pressures and comfort in elite cyclists after alterations in saddle height during ventilatory thresholds

Pedro Pérez‐Soriano, Alberto Encarnación‐Martínez, Carlos Sendra‐Pérez, Manuel Mateo‐March
2 citations
Journal of Sports Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
article

Modifications in pedaling kinematics, saddle pressures and comfort in elite cyclists after alterations in saddle height during ventilatory thresholds

Pedro Pérez‐Soriano, Alberto Encarnación‐Martínez, Carlos Sendra‐Pérez, Manuel Mateo‐March
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Clear evidence is lacking in cycling biomechanics research regarding the effects of pedaling at various saddle heights (SH) and intensities, hindering full comprehension of bicycle geometry configurations and their impacts on performance and potential injuries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of changes in SH (freely chosen, +2%, and -2%) at two intensities (First (VT1) and second (VT2) ventilatory threshold) on the pressures exerted on the saddle, the lower-limb kinematics, and perceived comfort. Twenty-four elite cyclists pedaled for 6 min on an ergometer at each of the saddle heights and intensities. The results of the kinematics showed differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) as a function of the SH in all the variables analyzed. The results of the saddle pressures showed an interaction between SH and saddle zones (<i>p</i> < 0.01) depending on intensity (<i>p</i> = 0.002). There were higher levels of overall perceived comfort in freely chosen SH. In conclusion, higher SH (+2%) produced greater pressures on the saddle, greater extension in the lower extremities, and less comfort for the cyclist. Regarding intensities, VT2 reduces the pressures exerted on the saddle, leading to increased ankle dorsiflexion and decreased hip flexion-extension which negatively impacts cyclist comfort when not pedaling at freely chosen SH.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 43(11)
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Universitat de València (ES), Universidad Europea (MX), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.