Landscape heterogeneity is structured by multidimensional components and land-cover proportion interactions

Abstract Landscape heterogeneity is a key driver of biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and resilience. However, its multiple components—compositional, configurational, vertical, and temporal— are rarely analysed together at broad spatial scales. Compositional heterogeneity refers to the number and proportions of different elements, configurational heterogeneity to their spatial arrangement and shape, vertical heterogeneity to variation in vegetation height, and temporal heterogeneity to interannual variation in land cover and management. Here we examine relationships among these components across forests, croplands, and grasslands using nationwide geospatial data from Germany. We show that compositional and configurational heterogeneity (Shannon diversity vs. edge density) are positively correlated, although their relationship varied with land-cover proportions. Contrary to common assumptions, configurational heterogeneity does not enhance habitat connectivity. Vertical and temporal heterogeneity are largely independent from horizontal heterogeneity. Forests are the main contributors to landscape heterogeneity across land-cover types, whereas croplands contribute little or even negatively. These findings highlight the importance of considering land-cover proportions and multi-dimensional heterogeneity when assessing landscape structure. Our results have broad implications for environmental monitoring and planning for biodiversity and ecosystem assessments, offering a framework to avoid hidden collinearity and consider multi-dimensional perspective and socio-ecological context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-77097-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape heterogeneity is structured by multidimensional components and land-cover proportion interactions

Reimund Paul Rötter, Thomas Kneib, Carola Paul, Tobías Plieninger et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Landscape heterogeneity is structured by multidimensional components and land-cover proportion interactions

Reimund Paul Rötter, Thomas Kneib, Carola Paul, Tobías Plieninger, Dominik Seidel, Kerstin Wiegand, Silke Hüttel, Stefan Siebert, Michael Schlund, Patrick Hostert, Soyeon Bae, Alexander Knohl, Birgitta Putzenlechner, Krisztina Kis‐Katos, Catrin Westphal, Christian Ammer, Holger Kreft
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Landscape heterogeneity is a key driver of biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and resilience. However, its multiple components—compositional, configurational, vertical, and temporal— are rarely analysed together at broad spatial scales. Compositional heterogeneity refers to the number and proportions of different elements, configurational heterogeneity to their spatial arrangement and shape, vertical heterogeneity to variation in vegetation height, and temporal heterogeneity to interannual variation in land cover and management. Here we examine relationships among these components across forests, croplands, and grasslands using nationwide geospatial data from Germany. We show that compositional and configurational heterogeneity (Shannon diversity vs. edge density) are positively correlated, although their relationship varied with land-cover proportions. Contrary to common assumptions, configurational heterogeneity does not enhance habitat connectivity. Vertical and temporal heterogeneity are largely independent from horizontal heterogeneity. Forests are the main contributors to landscape heterogeneity across land-cover types, whereas croplands contribute little or even negatively. These findings highlight the importance of considering land-cover proportions and multi-dimensional heterogeneity when assessing landscape structure. Our results have broad implications for environmental monitoring and planning for biodiversity and ecosystem assessments, offering a framework to avoid hidden collinearity and consider multi-dimensional perspective and socio-ecological context.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Kassel (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE), International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (NL), Campus-Institut Data Science (CIDAS) (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), University of Twente (NL)
Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Volkswagen Foundation, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon