The Research of the Conflict Military and Political Discourse Implemented in the Communicative Space of Different Linguocultures

Aim . To investigate the conflict military and political discourse, in implementation of which the contrasting aspects of linguistics are integrated, being the components of the communicative activities of participants of social-verbal interaction. Methodology. The conflict military and political environment is studied in a communicative situation as an forming specificity of values manifestations within a certain culture, development of the system of individual evaluation of participants of communication by opposite pragmatic vectors. Linguistic cultures are considered by the determinants of development of communicative activities of participants and discourse in general. The methodology of the research is based on a basic system and activity approach applied to the study of conflict military and political discourse. Cognitive and communicative, pragmatic and linguocultural methods are used as the main ones. The empirical material presented was reviewed using linguistic and component analysis methods in combination with opposing and comparative techniques. Results . Based on the study of the phenomenon of conflict military and political discourse in the communicative space of different linguistic cultures, the integrative element in the development of verbal and non-verbal actions of participants-opponents is revealed, which is the communicative potential of the implementation of opposite linguistic cultures in the actualization of cognitive strategies of constructing political discourse. In the course of the research, it was established that pragmatic indicators of communicative activity based on opposing cultural and value preferences act as characteristic features of conflict linguistic cultures in the role of means of communicative representation. The conflict is interpreted as a communicative phenomenon formed within the framework of the social-verbal interface of communicative activities, due to the significant difference in linguistic cultures, cultural worldviews and values of the participants in the discourse. Research implications . The theoretical significance of the study is explained by the contribution to the scientific study of conflict discourse, based on research in the field of the conflict military and political discourse. The presented information allows to consider the conflict in the permissible reality of implementation of linguistic cultures, which is a determinant for the formation of communicative activities of the participants-opponents and the development of the conflict military and political discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5075-2025-s1-43-53
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
49.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Research of the Conflict Military and Political Discourse Implemented in the Communicative Space of Different Linguocultures

Natalia Anatolyevna Sidorova, A. Yu. Sanieva
3 citations
Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
49.47
article

The Research of the Conflict Military and Political Discourse Implemented in the Communicative Space of Different Linguocultures

Natalia Anatolyevna Sidorova, A. Yu. Sanieva
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Aim . To investigate the conflict military and political discourse, in implementation of which the contrasting aspects of linguistics are integrated, being the components of the communicative activities of participants of social-verbal interaction. Methodology. The conflict military and political environment is studied in a communicative situation as an forming specificity of values manifestations within a certain culture, development of the system of individual evaluation of participants of communication by opposite pragmatic vectors. Linguistic cultures are considered by the determinants of development of communicative activities of participants and discourse in general. The methodology of the research is based on a basic system and activity approach applied to the study of conflict military and political discourse. Cognitive and communicative, pragmatic and linguocultural methods are used as the main ones. The empirical material presented was reviewed using linguistic and component analysis methods in combination with opposing and comparative techniques. Results . Based on the study of the phenomenon of conflict military and political discourse in the communicative space of different linguistic cultures, the integrative element in the development of verbal and non-verbal actions of participants-opponents is revealed, which is the communicative potential of the implementation of opposite linguistic cultures in the actualization of cognitive strategies of constructing political discourse. In the course of the research, it was established that pragmatic indicators of communicative activity based on opposing cultural and value preferences act as characteristic features of conflict linguistic cultures in the role of means of communicative representation. The conflict is interpreted as a communicative phenomenon formed within the framework of the social-verbal interface of communicative activities, due to the significant difference in linguistic cultures, cultural worldviews and values of the participants in the discourse. Research implications . The theoretical significance of the study is explained by the contribution to the scientific study of conflict discourse, based on research in the field of the conflict military and political discourse. The presented information allows to consider the conflict in the permissible reality of implementation of linguistic cultures, which is a determinant for the formation of communicative activities of the participants-opponents and the development of the conflict military and political discourse.

Key Issues of Contemporary Linguistics(1S)
Russian State Social University (RU), S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy (RU), Military University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
49.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.