The Influence of Online Public Opinion on Judicial Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Jiang Ge Case and Yao Jiaxin Case

As cyberspace increasingly becomes a "second space" in daily life, the impact of online public opinion on criminal judicial processes has grown significantly. However, online public opinion is often susceptible to manipulation or sensationalism by irresponsible media, ultimately jeopardizing judicial fairness and independence. Under the current framework of advancing the rule of law in China, it is imperative to address how to mitigate the negative effects of online public opinion on criminal justice while harnessing its positive role in promoting fairness. This paper takes the Jiang Ge case and Yao Jiaxin case as focal points, comparing criminal judicial practices in China and Japan from a comparative legal perspective to analyze conflicts between online public opinion and judicial rulings in China.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v6n3.23
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Online Public Opinion on Judicial Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Jiang Ge Case and Yao Jiaxin Case

Penghui Ma
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

The Influence of Online Public Opinion on Judicial Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Jiang Ge Case and Yao Jiaxin Case

Penghui Ma
article en

Abstract

As cyberspace increasingly becomes a "second space" in daily life, the impact of online public opinion on criminal judicial processes has grown significantly. However, online public opinion is often susceptible to manipulation or sensationalism by irresponsible media, ultimately jeopardizing judicial fairness and independence. Under the current framework of advancing the rule of law in China, it is imperative to address how to mitigate the negative effects of online public opinion on criminal justice while harnessing its positive role in promoting fairness. This paper takes the Jiang Ge case and Yao Jiaxin case as focal points, comparing criminal judicial practices in China and Japan from a comparative legal perspective to analyze conflicts between online public opinion and judicial rulings in China.

International Journal of Social Sciences and Public AdministrationVol. 6(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.