Comparative Study of Multiple Models for Lung Cancer Detection in Chest CT Images

Lung cancer is among the most prevalent malignant tumors affecting the lungs. Traditional methods of medical imaging diagnosis heavily rely on the expertise and judgment of radiologists, thereby introducing elements of subjectivity and significant time expenditure. This study aims to compare the efficacy of various deep learning models in lung cancer CT image analysis, specifically focusing on the MedMamba model, several conventional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models, and Transformer models. Through rigorous experimentation and comparative analysis, this paper elucidates the strengths and limitations of these models and, for the first time, provides an in-depth exploration of the Mamba model’s application potential in lung cancer CT image recognition and diagnosis without necessitating pre-training on extensive datasets. The experimental outcomes indicate that the MedMamba model achieves remarkable accuracy and low computational complexity even in a non-pretrained state, whereas pre-training markedly enhances the performance of all models. This investigation not only aims to optimize existing models but also seeks to explore the future potential of the Mamba model, thereby contributing to advancements in lung CT image classification and enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of early lung cancer diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icicml63543.2024.10958108
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Multiple Models for Lung Cancer Detection in Chest CT Images

Mingrui Qi
2 citations
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.81
article

Comparative Study of Multiple Models for Lung Cancer Detection in Chest CT Images

Mingrui Qi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Lung cancer is among the most prevalent malignant tumors affecting the lungs. Traditional methods of medical imaging diagnosis heavily rely on the expertise and judgment of radiologists, thereby introducing elements of subjectivity and significant time expenditure. This study aims to compare the efficacy of various deep learning models in lung cancer CT image analysis, specifically focusing on the MedMamba model, several conventional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models, and Transformer models. Through rigorous experimentation and comparative analysis, this paper elucidates the strengths and limitations of these models and, for the first time, provides an in-depth exploration of the Mamba model’s application potential in lung cancer CT image recognition and diagnosis without necessitating pre-training on extensive datasets. The experimental outcomes indicate that the MedMamba model achieves remarkable accuracy and low computational complexity even in a non-pretrained state, whereas pre-training markedly enhances the performance of all models. This investigation not only aims to optimize existing models but also seeks to explore the future potential of the Mamba model, thereby contributing to advancements in lung CT image classification and enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of early lung cancer diagnosis.

Northeastern University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study of Multiple Models for Lung Cancer Detection in Chest CT Images — Mingrui Qi · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS