File system performance comparison with Proxmox VE and KVM as type-1 Linux-based hypervisors

This paper provides a comparative analysis of file system performance between type-1 Linux-based hypervisors. Proxmox VE and KVM were selected as representative examples of type-1 Linux-based hypervisors. Though both hypervisors initially appear to have similar Linux-based and QEMU-based architectures, significant differences become apparent upon closer examination. For our experiments, we utilized Filebench due to its exceptional flexibility and adaptability, which allow it to emulate practical applications within realistic server environments. CentOS 9 was chosen as the guest operating system, serving as a common example of Linux distributions. Tests were performed with one, two, three, and four virtual machines running concurrently. Furthermore, this paper includes a mathematical model of the type-1 virtual environment, supplemented by a real-world experiment that serves as a case study. The mathematical model is used to interpret the performance results obtained from the experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/infoteh64129.2025.10959297
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

File system performance comparison with Proxmox VE and KVM as type-1 Linux-based hypervisors

Nikola Davidović, Nenad Kraljević, Kristina Janjić, Borislav Đorđević
2 citations
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
2.97
article

File system performance comparison with Proxmox VE and KVM as type-1 Linux-based hypervisors

Nikola Davidović, Nenad Kraljević, Kristina Janjić, Borislav Đorđević
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative analysis of file system performance between type-1 Linux-based hypervisors. Proxmox VE and KVM were selected as representative examples of type-1 Linux-based hypervisors. Though both hypervisors initially appear to have similar Linux-based and QEMU-based architectures, significant differences become apparent upon closer examination. For our experiments, we utilized Filebench due to its exceptional flexibility and adaptability, which allow it to emulate practical applications within realistic server environments. CentOS 9 was chosen as the guest operating system, serving as a common example of Linux distributions. Tests were performed with one, two, three, and four virtual machines running concurrently. Furthermore, this paper includes a mathematical model of the type-1 virtual environment, supplemented by a real-world experiment that serves as a case study. The mathematical model is used to interpret the performance results obtained from the experiments.

Institut Mihajlo Pupin (RS), University of East Sarajevo (BA), University of Belgrade (RS), Technical College of Applied Sciences (RS)
Ministry of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Data Storage Technologies
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

File system performance comparison with Proxmox VE and KVM as type-1 Linux-based hypervisors — Nikola Davidović, Nenad Kraljević, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS