Automation and Classification Cascade Methods for Object Detection : Organising Data Stack for Supervised Learning before Runnning Unnecessary Pathfinders

Let's assume this scenario, that a machine learning project has grouped 300 classes for each object type to detection, running common algorithms such as a Random walk in which every class can actually be bind to each other in small or larger clusters. A total possible combination for this use case would be around 2.037×10^89 possibilities of different groups. It’s not the amount of combinations that is in question here, but the time and energy consuming to compute this data, every time there would be a new object unsupervised to be properly classified. Therefore, the purpose of this paper aims to help machine learning beginners or enthusiasts, on their process of data stack structure, precisely at the beginning of the whole process, using as a case study of inside housing detection that uses more than 300 classes. Some examples and methodologies, including calculation models, are also cited with the final purpose to clear planning and guidance. The reason substantiated is the fact that many new machine learners, mostly students, are simply eager to run their code to get their object detection classification, directly to the purpose they want to achieve, no matter the path the machine is obliged to go until it shows some results. This anxiety is not only part of youth but part of the self-learning process when the machine starts to declare either is taking too long or the cost is becoming unbearable. Nevertheless, it’s a pain that can be avoided and the stack organisation helps developers additionally on defining better their patterns and create an automation process so that the future data will also just self-organize easily. There will be guidance using some previous works with some examples and algorithms to fully understand how simple, at the beginning, it is to organize data, and to better teach our machines, before just launching and learning at all cost. It is obvious that machines don’t complain and eventually they learn, however the following paper, shows graphically the method in an abstract way, as well as an example of inside house detection, hoping to be a great contribution to save time and to organise new projects for developers, at foundation level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icicml63543.2024.10957782
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automation and Classification Cascade Methods for Object Detection : Organising Data Stack for Supervised Learning before Runnning Unnecessary Pathfinders

Qiurong Yan, Kai Miao, Pedro Faria, Tomás Simões
1 citations
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
article

Automation and Classification Cascade Methods for Object Detection : Organising Data Stack for Supervised Learning before Runnning Unnecessary Pathfinders

Qiurong Yan, Kai Miao, Pedro Faria, Tomás Simões
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Let's assume this scenario, that a machine learning project has grouped 300 classes for each object type to detection, running common algorithms such as a Random walk in which every class can actually be bind to each other in small or larger clusters. A total possible combination for this use case would be around 2.037×10^89 possibilities of different groups. It’s not the amount of combinations that is in question here, but the time and energy consuming to compute this data, every time there would be a new object unsupervised to be properly classified. Therefore, the purpose of this paper aims to help machine learning beginners or enthusiasts, on their process of data stack structure, precisely at the beginning of the whole process, using as a case study of inside housing detection that uses more than 300 classes. Some examples and methodologies, including calculation models, are also cited with the final purpose to clear planning and guidance. The reason substantiated is the fact that many new machine learners, mostly students, are simply eager to run their code to get their object detection classification, directly to the purpose they want to achieve, no matter the path the machine is obliged to go until it shows some results. This anxiety is not only part of youth but part of the self-learning process when the machine starts to declare either is taking too long or the cost is becoming unbearable. Nevertheless, it’s a pain that can be avoided and the stack organisation helps developers additionally on defining better their patterns and create an automation process so that the future data will also just self-organize easily. There will be guidance using some previous works with some examples and algorithms to fully understand how simple, at the beginning, it is to organize data, and to better teach our machines, before just launching and learning at all cost. It is obvious that machines don’t complain and eventually they learn, however the following paper, shows graphically the method in an abstract way, as well as an example of inside house detection, hoping to be a great contribution to save time and to organise new projects for developers, at foundation level.

Universidade Politécnica de Castelo Branco (PT), University of Beira Interior (PT), University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.