Research on Climate Governance Provisions in International Investment Treaties

The climate governance models involved in international investment law are mainly divided into three types: the hard law approach, the soft law approach, and the approach that combines both hard and soft law. Each of these approaches offers solutions to different climate governance issues in international investment.This paper argues that the crux of the climate governance challenges in international investment lies in the conflict between the economic value of efficiency and the international public principle of efficiency. According to international practice, the reasons for the differences in climate governance models in international investment include the pluralism of legal interpretation, the fragmentation of treaties and other international documents, and the differences in the construction of legitimacy and legality.This paper believes that state actors can address the conflict between the legitimacy and legality of climate protection clauses in international investment by establishing a dual path of “hard law and soft law” through international cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v6n3.28
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Climate Governance Provisions in International Investment Treaties

Yunda Yu
International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Research on Climate Governance Provisions in International Investment Treaties

Yunda Yu
article en

Abstract

The climate governance models involved in international investment law are mainly divided into three types: the hard law approach, the soft law approach, and the approach that combines both hard and soft law. Each of these approaches offers solutions to different climate governance issues in international investment.This paper argues that the crux of the climate governance challenges in international investment lies in the conflict between the economic value of efficiency and the international public principle of efficiency. According to international practice, the reasons for the differences in climate governance models in international investment include the pluralism of legal interpretation, the fragmentation of treaties and other international documents, and the differences in the construction of legitimacy and legality.This paper believes that state actors can address the conflict between the legitimacy and legality of climate protection clauses in international investment by establishing a dual path of “hard law and soft law” through international cooperation.

International Journal of Social Sciences and Public AdministrationVol. 6(3)
Guangzhou University (CN), Anhui Xinhua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.