Image Quality Assessment Characteristics for Super-Resolution

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), Image Quality Assessment (IQA) techniques are increasingly used to evaluate the quality of images reconstructed through Super Resolution (SR). However, most IQA methods do not consider how the human eye assesses image quality; they primarily rely on complex networks for accuracy. This paper examines the relationship between humans and AI, arguing that IQA methods that integrate both top-down and bottom-up processes better align with human evaluation, whereas AI typically uses a solely bottom-up approach. We evaluate images generated by various SR algorithms using these two IQA methodologies. Experimental results show that humans prefer SR algorithms that emphasize global image features, while AI favors those focusing on local features. These findings highlight a divergence in image quality preferences between humans and AI, underscoring the need to select algorithms based on specific application scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icicml63543.2024.10957957
Primary Topic
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image Quality Assessment Characteristics for Super-Resolution

Bifeng Cui, Yanxu Zhu, Pengyu Liu, Qian Li
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
article

Image Quality Assessment Characteristics for Super-Resolution

Bifeng Cui, Yanxu Zhu, Pengyu Liu, Qian Li
article en

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), Image Quality Assessment (IQA) techniques are increasingly used to evaluate the quality of images reconstructed through Super Resolution (SR). However, most IQA methods do not consider how the human eye assesses image quality; they primarily rely on complex networks for accuracy. This paper examines the relationship between humans and AI, arguing that IQA methods that integrate both top-down and bottom-up processes better align with human evaluation, whereas AI typically uses a solely bottom-up approach. We evaluate images generated by various SR algorithms using these two IQA methodologies. Experimental results show that humans prefer SR algorithms that emphasize global image features, while AI favors those focusing on local features. These findings highlight a divergence in image quality preferences between humans and AI, underscoring the need to select algorithms based on specific application scenarios.

Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Image Quality Assessment Characteristics for Super-Resolution — Bifeng Cui, Yanxu Zhu, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS