Canada/US (CANUS) Comparison of Masonry Beam Design and Detailing Provisions

This work is one of the four companion papers associated with the Canada/US (CANUS) collaborative project: Harmonization of Canadian and American Masonry Structures Design Standards. This particular paper specifically delves into a comparison of the design and detailing provisions for masonry beams in the U.S. and Canada. The scope of the investigation covers the similarities and divergences between the two design standards (CSA S304-14 and TMS 402-16), through first a comparative discussion of the provisions followed by parametric studies that illustrate the differences quantitatively. Several areas of further investigation are identified as a result of this work, which if addressed, may improve and harmonize the two standards and practices. For instance, the ๐œ’ factor utilized in C SA S 304-14 amplifies the divergence such that most masonry beam designs that have been safely constructed in the U.S. are not possible in Canada. In contrast, TMS 402-16 does not have clear guidance on deflection limits or intermediate reinforcement for regular beams; and a reconsideration for modulus of rupture values may be warranted, as the code-provided values are based on historic wallette tests instead of beams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Masonry Society Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70803/001c.136441
Primary Topic
Civil and Structural Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canada/US (CANUS) Comparison of Masonry Beam Design and Detailing Provisions

Bennett Banting, Ece Erdogmus, Jason Thompson, Richard M. Bennett
The Masonry Society Journal
Civil and Structural Engineering Research
article

Canada/US (CANUS) Comparison of Masonry Beam Design and Detailing Provisions

Bennett Banting, Ece Erdogmus, Jason Thompson, Richard M. Bennett
article en

Abstract

This work is one of the four companion papers associated with the Canada/US (CANUS) collaborative project: Harmonization of Canadian and American Masonry Structures Design Standards. This particular paper specifically delves into a comparison of the design and detailing provisions for masonry beams in the U.S. and Canada. The scope of the investigation covers the similarities and divergences between the two design standards (CSA S304-14 and TMS 402-16), through first a comparative discussion of the provisions followed by parametric studies that illustrate the differences quantitatively. Several areas of further investigation are identified as a result of this work, which if addressed, may improve and harmonize the two standards and practices. For instance, the ๐œ’ factor utilized in C SA S 304-14 amplifies the divergence such that most masonry beam designs that have been safely constructed in the U.S. are not possible in Canada. In contrast, TMS 402-16 does not have clear guidance on deflection limits or intermediate reinforcement for regular beams; and a reconsideration for modulus of rupture values may be warranted, as the code-provided values are based on historic wallette tests instead of beams.

The Masonry Society JournalVol. 42(1)
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Civil and Structural Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Canada/US (CANUS) Comparison of Masonry Beam Design and Detailing Provisions โ€” Bennett Banting, Ece Erdogmus, et al. ยท The Masonry Society Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS