Investigating perioperative pressure injuries and factors influencing them with imbalanced samples using a Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique

This study investigates the use of machine learning (ML) models combined with a Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants to predict perioperative pressure injuries (PIs) in an imbalanced dataset. PIs are a significant healthcare problem, often leading to prolonged hospitalization and increased medical costs. Conventional risk assessment scales are limited in their ability to predict PIs accurately, prompting the exploration of ML techniques to address this challenge.We utilized data from 7,292 patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Shanghai between May 2017 and July 2023, with a final dataset of 2,972 patients, including 158 with PIs. Seven ML algorithms-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Extra Trees (ET), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Trees (DT)-were used in conjunction with SMOTE, SMOTE+ENN, Borderline-SMOTE, ADASYN, and GAN to balance the dataset and improve model performance.Results revealed significant improvements in model performance when SMOTE and its variants were used. For instance, the XGBoost model hadan AUC of 0.996 with SMOTE, compared to 0.800 on raw data. SMOTE+ENN and Borderline-SMOTE further enhanced the models' ability to identify minority classes. External validation indicatedthat XGBoost, RF, and ET exhibited the highest stability and accuracy, with XGBoost having an AUC of 0.977. SHAP analysis revealed that factors such as anesthesia grade, age, and serum albumin levels significantly influenced model predictions.In conclusion, integrating SMOTE with ML algorithms effectively addressed a data imbalance and improved the prediction of perioperative PIs. Future work should focus on refining SMOTE techniques and exploring their application to larger, multi-center datasets to enhance the generalizability of these findings, and especially for diseaseswith a lowincidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience Trends
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2025.01013
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating perioperative pressure injuries and factors influencing them with imbalanced samples using a Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique

Liping Jiang, Yiwei Zhou, Xin Xu, Ping Liu et al.
2 citations
BioScience Trends
Textile materials and evaluations
1.21
article

Investigating perioperative pressure injuries and factors influencing them with imbalanced samples using a Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique

Liping Jiang, Yiwei Zhou, Xin Xu, Ping Liu, Jian Wu, Guirong Shi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the use of machine learning (ML) models combined with a Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants to predict perioperative pressure injuries (PIs) in an imbalanced dataset. PIs are a significant healthcare problem, often leading to prolonged hospitalization and increased medical costs. Conventional risk assessment scales are limited in their ability to predict PIs accurately, prompting the exploration of ML techniques to address this challenge.We utilized data from 7,292 patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Shanghai between May 2017 and July 2023, with a final dataset of 2,972 patients, including 158 with PIs. Seven ML algorithms-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Extra Trees (ET), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Trees (DT)-were used in conjunction with SMOTE, SMOTE+ENN, Borderline-SMOTE, ADASYN, and GAN to balance the dataset and improve model performance.Results revealed significant improvements in model performance when SMOTE and its variants were used. For instance, the XGBoost model hadan AUC of 0.996 with SMOTE, compared to 0.800 on raw data. SMOTE+ENN and Borderline-SMOTE further enhanced the models' ability to identify minority classes. External validation indicatedthat XGBoost, RF, and ET exhibited the highest stability and accuracy, with XGBoost having an AUC of 0.977. SHAP analysis revealed that factors such as anesthesia grade, age, and serum albumin levels significantly influenced model predictions.In conclusion, integrating SMOTE with ML algorithms effectively addressed a data imbalance and improved the prediction of perioperative PIs. Future work should focus on refining SMOTE techniques and exploring their application to larger, multi-center datasets to enhance the generalizability of these findings, and especially for diseaseswith a lowincidence.

BioScience TrendsVol. 19(2)
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), XinHua Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Textile materials and evaluations
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.