Orbital exenteration in the management of orbital and periorbital tumours: Factors related to treatment outcomes

The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications for surgery, patient and healthcare delays, ophthalmic status, challenges of management, complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients treated by orbital exenteration at a tertiary care centre. Patients who underwent orbital exenteration during an 18-year period (2005-2022) were identified from the Helsinki University Hospital (Helsinki, Finland). Demographic and medical data were retrieved. Sixty-nine patients were included. Median age was 74 years (range, 7-93 years). The most common operative indication for exenteration was a malignant tumour (99%). Histopathological types that were most frequently encountered were uveal melanoma in 10 (14%), basal cell carcinoma in 9, (13%) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in 8 (12%) patients. Orbital exenteration could have been avoided in 32 (46%) patients if the primary surgery had been performed with sufficient margins and without delay. The median follow-up time was 16 months (range, 0-169 months). At the end of follow-up, 34 (49%) patients had no evidence of disease, 12 (17%) were alive with disease and 23 (33%) had died of the disease. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed 1- and 2-year DFS of 74% and 67%, respectively. One- and 2-year OS were 77% and 69%, respectively. Selected periorbital malignancies, especially those with insufficient primary treatment or with treatment delay, may warrant exenteration. Given the diverse origins of malignancies, a multidisciplinary approach, including ophthalmological consultation, appears to be the optimal strategy for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.060
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orbital exenteration in the management of orbital and periorbital tumours: Factors related to treatment outcomes

Antti A. Mäkitie, Mika Määttänen, Jyrki Vuola, Paula Niinimäki et al.
5 citations
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
10.03
article

Orbital exenteration in the management of orbital and periorbital tumours: Factors related to treatment outcomes

Antti A. Mäkitie, Mika Määttänen, Jyrki Vuola, Paula Niinimäki, Tero Kivelä, Marita Uusitalo
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications for surgery, patient and healthcare delays, ophthalmic status, challenges of management, complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients treated by orbital exenteration at a tertiary care centre. Patients who underwent orbital exenteration during an 18-year period (2005-2022) were identified from the Helsinki University Hospital (Helsinki, Finland). Demographic and medical data were retrieved. Sixty-nine patients were included. Median age was 74 years (range, 7-93 years). The most common operative indication for exenteration was a malignant tumour (99%). Histopathological types that were most frequently encountered were uveal melanoma in 10 (14%), basal cell carcinoma in 9, (13%) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in 8 (12%) patients. Orbital exenteration could have been avoided in 32 (46%) patients if the primary surgery had been performed with sufficient margins and without delay. The median follow-up time was 16 months (range, 0-169 months). At the end of follow-up, 34 (49%) patients had no evidence of disease, 12 (17%) were alive with disease and 23 (33%) had died of the disease. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed 1- and 2-year DFS of 74% and 67%, respectively. One- and 2-year OS were 77% and 69%, respectively. Selected periorbital malignancies, especially those with insufficient primary treatment or with treatment delay, may warrant exenteration. Given the diverse origins of malignancies, a multidisciplinary approach, including ophthalmological consultation, appears to be the optimal strategy for these patients.

Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic SurgeryVol. 105
University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri, Finska Läkaresällskapet, Mary och Georg C. Ehrnrooths Stiftelse, Silmä- ja kudospankkisäätiö, Silmäsäätiö
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
10.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.