An Exploration of How Motivations and Perceived Ability Influence an Advisor's Willingness to Give Advice

ABSTRACT Decision‐makers frequently rely on advice from advisors, yet little is known about the factors influencing advisors' willingness to give advice (WTGA). This paper explores WTGA through three studies, investigating its relationship to advice quality, an advisor's motivations, and abilities. Our findings show that advisors frequently demonstrate a willingness to give advice even when their solution to the specific problem is incorrect, resulting in the dissemination of poor‐quality advice. We find that both the helping and influence motives predict WTGA, with the helping motivation playing a more dominant role. Finally, we find that WTGA varies significantly as a function of advisors' perceptions of their ability to solve advice problems but is not consistently linked to their actual ability in the domain. This research highlights the importance of understanding the motivations and abilities of advisors in order to improve the quality of advice, with implications for decision‐makers who rely on such guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.70017
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Exploration of How Motivations and Perceived Ability Influence an Advisor's Willingness to Give Advice

Kurt A. Carlson, Robin L. Dillon, Ishani Banerji
1 links
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

An Exploration of How Motivations and Perceived Ability Influence an Advisor's Willingness to Give Advice

Kurt A. Carlson, Robin L. Dillon, Ishani Banerji
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Decision‐makers frequently rely on advice from advisors, yet little is known about the factors influencing advisors' willingness to give advice (WTGA). This paper explores WTGA through three studies, investigating its relationship to advice quality, an advisor's motivations, and abilities. Our findings show that advisors frequently demonstrate a willingness to give advice even when their solution to the specific problem is incorrect, resulting in the dissemination of poor‐quality advice. We find that both the helping and influence motives predict WTGA, with the helping motivation playing a more dominant role. Finally, we find that WTGA varies significantly as a function of advisors' perceptions of their ability to solve advice problems but is not consistently linked to their actual ability in the domain. This research highlights the importance of understanding the motivations and abilities of advisors in order to improve the quality of advice, with implications for decision‐makers who rely on such guidance.

Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingVol. 38(2)
William & Mary (US), Georgetown University (US), Williams (United States) (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.