Gender inequality in STEM: a global assessment of key influencing factors across nations

This study investigates five major factors that contribute to gaps in STEM participation: stereotypes and cultural norms, educational access and quality, workplace discrimination and bias, representation and role models, and policy and institutional support. Societal norms affect conceptions of STEM as male-dominated disciplines, restricting female participation from a young age. Educational disadvantages, such as unequal access to STEM resources and gendered teaching styles, impede women's participation. In professional environments, workplace biases impede recruiting, promotion, and financing, restricting career advancement. The underrepresentation of female role models exacerbates these issues, lowering expectations among young women. Furthermore, disparities in national policies and institutional support structures have a substantial impact on gender equity, affecting recruitment, retention, and total STEM participation. Through a cross-national analysis, this research highlights systemic challenges and explores policy interventions that can foster greater inclusivity in STEM fields worldwide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss040203
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender inequality in STEM: a global assessment of key influencing factors across nations

April Mae Gabutero, Regina Galigao, Kyle Jay Padilla
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Career Development and Diversity
article

Gender inequality in STEM: a global assessment of key influencing factors across nations

April Mae Gabutero, Regina Galigao, Kyle Jay Padilla
article en

Abstract

This study investigates five major factors that contribute to gaps in STEM participation: stereotypes and cultural norms, educational access and quality, workplace discrimination and bias, representation and role models, and policy and institutional support. Societal norms affect conceptions of STEM as male-dominated disciplines, restricting female participation from a young age. Educational disadvantages, such as unequal access to STEM resources and gendered teaching styles, impede women's participation. In professional environments, workplace biases impede recruiting, promotion, and financing, restricting career advancement. The underrepresentation of female role models exacerbates these issues, lowering expectations among young women. Furthermore, disparities in national policies and institutional support structures have a substantial impact on gender equity, affecting recruitment, retention, and total STEM participation. Through a cross-national analysis, this research highlights systemic challenges and explores policy interventions that can foster greater inclusivity in STEM fields worldwide.

Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender inequality in STEM: a global assessment of key influencing factors across nations — April Mae Gabutero, Regina Galigao, et al. · Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS