Implicitly learned bias impacts decision-making but not metacognition

People can implicitly learn biases that affect decisions. It is unclear if implicit and explicit learning of priors differentially influenced performance. Participants judged the orientation of moving dot patterns with stimuli occurring more frequently in one of the orientations depending on the color. Participants were or were not told about the base-rate differences. The explicitly informed group showed a greater application of the prior, although participants who were not aware of the two priors also showed a response bias. For participants who learned the priors implicitly there was only an effect of the prior when no diagnostic sensory information was available. Those who were instructed of the priors were more confident for prior-consistent stimuli while this was not seen in participants who merely experienced the priors.These results suggest that base-rate priors can be learned implicitly and can bias perceptual decisions, but this bias does not appear to affect confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consciousness and Cognition
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2025.103857
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicitly learned bias impacts decision-making but not metacognition

Barbara J. Knowlton, Julia M. Schorn
Consciousness and Cognition
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Implicitly learned bias impacts decision-making but not metacognition

Barbara J. Knowlton, Julia M. Schorn
article en

Abstract

People can implicitly learn biases that affect decisions. It is unclear if implicit and explicit learning of priors differentially influenced performance. Participants judged the orientation of moving dot patterns with stimuli occurring more frequently in one of the orientations depending on the color. Participants were or were not told about the base-rate differences. The explicitly informed group showed a greater application of the prior, although participants who were not aware of the two priors also showed a response bias. For participants who learned the priors implicitly there was only an effect of the prior when no diagnostic sensory information was available. Those who were instructed of the priors were more confident for prior-consistent stimuli while this was not seen in participants who merely experienced the priors.These results suggest that base-rate priors can be learned implicitly and can bias perceptual decisions, but this bias does not appear to affect confidence.

Consciousness and CognitionVol. 131
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.