Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Regulation

This article presents recent methodological innovations in the area of cost and benefit assessment of government regulation, in both a prospective and a retrospective sense. The focus of this review is mostly limited to the United States and from the Economics discipline's perspective. Much of the extant progress in measurement has occurred on the front of private costs of compliance. Private benefits, social costs, and social benefits remain much less systematically organized and more arduous to quantitatively assess, mostly due to the difficulty of standardizing partial and general equilibrium counterfactuals. We offer a discussion on potential future methodological improvements in cost–benefit analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081224-104518
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Regulation

Miao Ben Zhang, Matilde Bombardini, Francesco Trebbi
Annual Review of Economics
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Regulation

Miao Ben Zhang, Matilde Bombardini, Francesco Trebbi
article en

Abstract

This article presents recent methodological innovations in the area of cost and benefit assessment of government regulation, in both a prospective and a retrospective sense. The focus of this review is mostly limited to the United States and from the Economics discipline's perspective. Much of the extant progress in measurement has occurred on the front of private costs of compliance. Private benefits, social costs, and social benefits remain much less systematically organized and more arduous to quantitatively assess, mostly due to the difficulty of standardizing partial and general equilibrium counterfactuals. We offer a discussion on potential future methodological improvements in cost–benefit analysis.

Annual Review of EconomicsVol. 17(1)
University of Southern California (US), National Bureau of Economic Research (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.