Iconicity as an organizing principle of the lexicon

The view that words are arbitrary is a foundational assumption about language, used to set human languages apart from nonhuman communication. We present here a study of the alignment between the semantic and phonological structure (systematicity) of American Sign Language (ASL), and for comparison, two spoken languages-English and Spanish. Across all three languages, words that are semantically related are more likely to be phonologically related, highlighting systematic alignment between word form and word meaning. Critically, there is a significant effect of iconicity (a perceived physical resemblance between word form and word meaning) on this alignment: words are most likely to be phonologically related when they are semantically related and iconic. This phenomenon is particularly widespread in ASL: half of the signs in the ASL lexicon are <i>iconically</i> related to other signs, i.e., there is a nonarbitrary relationship between form and meaning that is shared across signs. Taken together, the results reveal that iconicity can act as a driving force behind the alignment between the semantic and phonological structure of spoken and signed languages, but languages may differ in the extent that iconicity structures the lexicon. Theories of language must account for iconicity as a possible organizing principle of the lexicon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401041122
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iconicity as an organizing principle of the lexicon

Karen Emmorey, Naomi Caselli, Erin E. Campbell, Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg et al.
6 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Hearing Impairment and Communication
20.67
article

Iconicity as an organizing principle of the lexicon

Karen Emmorey, Naomi Caselli, Erin E. Campbell, Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg, Zed Sevcikova Sehyr, Elana Pontecorvo
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The view that words are arbitrary is a foundational assumption about language, used to set human languages apart from nonhuman communication. We present here a study of the alignment between the semantic and phonological structure (systematicity) of American Sign Language (ASL), and for comparison, two spoken languages-English and Spanish. Across all three languages, words that are semantically related are more likely to be phonologically related, highlighting systematic alignment between word form and word meaning. Critically, there is a significant effect of iconicity (a perceived physical resemblance between word form and word meaning) on this alignment: words are most likely to be phonologically related when they are semantically related and iconic. This phenomenon is particularly widespread in ASL: half of the signs in the ASL lexicon are <i>iconically</i> related to other signs, i.e., there is a nonarbitrary relationship between form and meaning that is shared across signs. Taken together, the results reveal that iconicity can act as a driving force behind the alignment between the semantic and phonological structure of spoken and signed languages, but languages may differ in the extent that iconicity structures the lexicon. Theories of language must account for iconicity as a possible organizing principle of the lexicon.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(16)
Boston University (US), Tufts University (US), Chapman University (US), San Diego State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
20.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.