Toward multiscalar measures of inequality in archaeology

The Gini coefficient is a statistical measure commonly used to characterize distributions of socioeconomic quantities. Archaeologists and social scientists have recently adopted this method to analyze ancient inequality by targeting specific proxy variables (e.g., residential unit size, burial data, etc.). Variations in the Gini are then examined in relation to key factors such as time, geography, and subsistence. Yet, Gini coefficients could be obtained across different scales of aggregation, from small neighborhoods within a larger settlement to an ensemble of multiple settlements that are part of the same polity. These different scales of aggregation represent considerable methodological and theoretical challenges, as larger scales might, for example, imply greater social and economic variation within groups and thus affect the Gini coefficients. Furthermore, these issues can also be exacerbated by the idiosyncrasies and limitations of historical and archaeological datasets. This paper discusses the potential and challenges of measuring Gini coefficients at and above the scale of individual archaeological sites, contrasting different approaches and discussing how each can reveal insights into different patterns of past wealth inequality, addressing methodological, empirical, and theoretical implications arising from the multiscalar nature of human interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400700121
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward multiscalar measures of inequality in archaeology

Enrico R. Crema, Scott G. Ortman, Andrés G. Mejía Ramón, Jessica L. Munson et al.
7 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Historical Economic and Social Studies
21.92
article

Toward multiscalar measures of inequality in archaeology

Enrico R. Crema, Scott G. Ortman, Andrés G. Mejía Ramón, Jessica L. Munson, Mattia Fochesato
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The Gini coefficient is a statistical measure commonly used to characterize distributions of socioeconomic quantities. Archaeologists and social scientists have recently adopted this method to analyze ancient inequality by targeting specific proxy variables (e.g., residential unit size, burial data, etc.). Variations in the Gini are then examined in relation to key factors such as time, geography, and subsistence. Yet, Gini coefficients could be obtained across different scales of aggregation, from small neighborhoods within a larger settlement to an ensemble of multiple settlements that are part of the same polity. These different scales of aggregation represent considerable methodological and theoretical challenges, as larger scales might, for example, imply greater social and economic variation within groups and thus affect the Gini coefficients. Furthermore, these issues can also be exacerbated by the idiosyncrasies and limitations of historical and archaeological datasets. This paper discusses the potential and challenges of measuring Gini coefficients at and above the scale of individual archaeological sites, contrasting different approaches and discussing how each can reveal insights into different patterns of past wealth inequality, addressing methodological, empirical, and theoretical implications arising from the multiscalar nature of human interactions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(16)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP), University of Cambridge (GB), Arthur B. McDonald-Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research Institute (CA), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), Lycoming College (US), Bocconi University (IT)
National Science Foundation, Santa Fe Institute
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Historical Economic and Social Studies
21.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.