Assessing grand narratives of economic inequality across time

Long-entrenched grand narratives have tied inequality in large human aggregations to generally linear trends, a direct outcome of domestication, then fostered by population growth and/or stepped scalar transitions in the hierarchical complexity of human institutions. This general pattern has been argued to short-circuit or reverse only in the context of cataclysmic disasters or societal breakdowns. Yet, for the most part, these universal deterministic frameworks have been constructed from historical or ethnographic snapshots in time and afford little systematic attention to human institutions or agency. Here, we leverage quantitative, temporally defined archaeological, and ethnographic data from a suite of global regions, most of which transitioned through the process of urbanism and complex hierarchy formation, to examine shifts in degrees of inequality over time. Although broad temporal patterns are evidenced, the regional trends in inequality are neither linear, uniform, nor triggered immediately or mechanically by Malthusian dynamics or scalar increases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400698121
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
69.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing grand narratives of economic inequality across time

Amy E. Thompson, Linda M. Nicholas, Gary M. Feinman, Dan Lawrence et al.
16 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
69.26
article

Assessing grand narratives of economic inequality across time

Amy E. Thompson, Linda M. Nicholas, Gary M. Feinman, Dan Lawrence, Scott G. Ortman, Cameron A. Petrie, Jessica L. Munson, Adam S. Green, Gabriela Cervantes Quequezana
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Long-entrenched grand narratives have tied inequality in large human aggregations to generally linear trends, a direct outcome of domestication, then fostered by population growth and/or stepped scalar transitions in the hierarchical complexity of human institutions. This general pattern has been argued to short-circuit or reverse only in the context of cataclysmic disasters or societal breakdowns. Yet, for the most part, these universal deterministic frameworks have been constructed from historical or ethnographic snapshots in time and afford little systematic attention to human institutions or agency. Here, we leverage quantitative, temporally defined archaeological, and ethnographic data from a suite of global regions, most of which transitioned through the process of urbanism and complex hierarchy formation, to examine shifts in degrees of inequality over time. Although broad temporal patterns are evidenced, the regional trends in inequality are neither linear, uniform, nor triggered immediately or mechanically by Malthusian dynamics or scalar increases.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(16)
The King's College (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Durham University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Field Museum of Natural History (US), University of York (GB), Lycoming College (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, Santa Fe Institute
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
69.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.