Measurement of music streamers’ preferences using best-worst scaling and conjoint analysis methods

Purpose: The main aim of the research was to measure the music streamers’ preferences using Best-Worst Scaling and conjoint analysis methods. The additional purpose is to compare the results obtained from both used methods, which should get similar conclusions. Finally, the cooperation of the support.BWS3 and conjoint R packages as the one common tool for measurement of stated preferences was also examined. Design/methodology/approach: Multi-profile Best-Worst Scaling method uses a modeling approach based on the conditional logit model, whereas traditional conjoint analysis method applies a linear regression model. Therefore, comparing the results of both methods was even more interesting. Findings: In the paper, the results of measurement and analysis of music streamers’ preferences were presented, calculations from different preference models were confronted and the correct use of R packages in the form of completed scripts was demonstrated. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of one used method were compensated by the second one. The cooperation of both methods and used R packages was not only confirmed but also led to complete the research results. Practical implications: The research results, as well as the combined use of some R packages may interest practitioners, researchers and students in the fields of marketing research, in the area of measurement of consumers’ preferences. Streaming companies, manufacturers of playback equipment, artist and record labels as well as marketers should be interested in the research results. Social implications: One of the used packages – authoring conjoint R package implements the traditional conjoint analysis method similarly to the module Conjoint IBM SPSS program. The statistics (over a half million of downloads) indicate that the non-commercial conjoint package is popular among R users. Originality/value: In addition to the benefits in form of conclusions drawn from the research, the paper presents one more example confirming results of both used methods. There are no similar studies confirming the results of multi-profile Best-Worst Scaling (Case 3 BWS) and traditional conjoint analysis methods based on measurement of music streamers’ preferences. Keywords: stated consumers’ preferences, Best-Worst Scaling, conjoint analysis, R program. Category of the paper: research paper. JEL Classification: C6, C8, D1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.218.2
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement of music streamers’ preferences using best-worst scaling and conjoint analysis methods

Tomasz Bartłomowicz
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Measurement of music streamers’ preferences using best-worst scaling and conjoint analysis methods

Tomasz Bartłomowicz
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The main aim of the research was to measure the music streamers’ preferences using Best-Worst Scaling and conjoint analysis methods. The additional purpose is to compare the results obtained from both used methods, which should get similar conclusions. Finally, the cooperation of the support.BWS3 and conjoint R packages as the one common tool for measurement of stated preferences was also examined. Design/methodology/approach: Multi-profile Best-Worst Scaling method uses a modeling approach based on the conditional logit model, whereas traditional conjoint analysis method applies a linear regression model. Therefore, comparing the results of both methods was even more interesting. Findings: In the paper, the results of measurement and analysis of music streamers’ preferences were presented, calculations from different preference models were confronted and the correct use of R packages in the form of completed scripts was demonstrated. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of one used method were compensated by the second one. The cooperation of both methods and used R packages was not only confirmed but also led to complete the research results. Practical implications: The research results, as well as the combined use of some R packages may interest practitioners, researchers and students in the fields of marketing research, in the area of measurement of consumers’ preferences. Streaming companies, manufacturers of playback equipment, artist and record labels as well as marketers should be interested in the research results. Social implications: One of the used packages – authoring conjoint R package implements the traditional conjoint analysis method similarly to the module Conjoint IBM SPSS program. The statistics (over a half million of downloads) indicate that the non-commercial conjoint package is popular among R users. Originality/value: In addition to the benefits in form of conclusions drawn from the research, the paper presents one more example confirming results of both used methods. There are no similar studies confirming the results of multi-profile Best-Worst Scaling (Case 3 BWS) and traditional conjoint analysis methods based on measurement of music streamers’ preferences. Keywords: stated consumers’ preferences, Best-Worst Scaling, conjoint analysis, R program. Category of the paper: research paper. JEL Classification: C6, C8, D1.

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management SeriesVol. 2025(218)
Wroclaw University of Economics and Business (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.