Is Set for Variability Performance Dependent on Prior Successful Decoding Attempts for Certain Items? An Item-Level Examination

Purpose: The relationship between the set for variability (SfV) task and various isolated word reading measures in developing readers is high (ranging from .60 to .80 across studies). Elbro et al. (2012) offered that SfV skill serves as a second step in the decoding process allowing the decoded form of the letter string to be matched with the stored phonological form. An alternative explanation is that during item-based orthographic learning children produce and perhaps store a decoded form of the word that can be accessed during the SfV task, facilitating performance. In the current study we explore the possibility that this second hypothesis can help explain SfV performance for certain items. Method: In a sample of 499 children (grades 2–5), item-level analyses were used to explore the possibility that performance on certain SfV items might be dependent on prior successful decoding attempts (SDA) while controlling for important child attributes (e.g., decoding skill) and word characteristics (e.g., spelling-to-pronunciation transparency). Results: Results suggest that some (but not all) words on the SfV task may be dependent on prior SDA. Words that are dependent on prior SDA tend to have fewer phonemes and syllables, but no other word features explored significantly differ between SDA dependent and independent words. Conclusion: We propose that to correctly complete the SfV task, certain items may require the word to have been previously decoded successfully. These findings have implications for how the relationship between SfV and word reading is interpreted and tested moving forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Studies of Reading
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2026.2704734
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
40.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Set for Variability Performance Dependent on Prior Successful Decoding Attempts for Certain Items? An Item-Level Examination

Noam Siegelman, Laura M. Steacy, Donald L. Compton, Signy Wegener et al.
1 citations
Scientific Studies of Reading
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
40.48
article

Is Set for Variability Performance Dependent on Prior Successful Decoding Attempts for Certain Items? An Item-Level Examination

Noam Siegelman, Laura M. Steacy, Donald L. Compton, Signy Wegener, Valeria M. Rigobon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between the set for variability (SfV) task and various isolated word reading measures in developing readers is high (ranging from .60 to .80 across studies). Elbro et al. (2012) offered that SfV skill serves as a second step in the decoding process allowing the decoded form of the letter string to be matched with the stored phonological form. An alternative explanation is that during item-based orthographic learning children produce and perhaps store a decoded form of the word that can be accessed during the SfV task, facilitating performance. In the current study we explore the possibility that this second hypothesis can help explain SfV performance for certain items. Method: In a sample of 499 children (grades 2–5), item-level analyses were used to explore the possibility that performance on certain SfV items might be dependent on prior successful decoding attempts (SDA) while controlling for important child attributes (e.g., decoding skill) and word characteristics (e.g., spelling-to-pronunciation transparency). Results: Results suggest that some (but not all) words on the SfV task may be dependent on prior SDA. Words that are dependent on prior SDA tend to have fewer phonemes and syllables, but no other word features explored significantly differ between SDA dependent and independent words. Conclusion: We propose that to correctly complete the SfV task, certain items may require the word to have been previously decoded successfully. These findings have implications for how the relationship between SfV and word reading is interpreted and tested moving forward.

Scientific Studies of Reading
Florida State University (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Australian Catholic University (AU), Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
Florida State University, Institute of Education Sciences, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
40.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.