Eliciting the deserving winner in the presence of enemies

Abstract We analyze the problem of a jury that has to select the deserving winner from a group of candidates when (i) the identity of the deserving winner is known to all jurors but not verifiable, (ii) each juror identifies with a different candidate whom they want to favor, and (iii) some jurors may have enemies among the candidates whom they want to harm. We introduce a necessary condition relating to the jurors’ enemies for implementing the deserving winner, called minimal impartiality. The mechanisms proposed in the literature to implement the deserving winner via backward induction fail when jurors have enemies, even though minimal impartiality is satisfied. We propose a simple sequential mechanism that successfully implements the deserving winner via backward induction, whether the jurors have enemies or not, as long as minimal impartiality is satisfied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01600-2
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eliciting the deserving winner in the presence of enemies

Pablo Amorós
Social Choice and Welfare
Auction Theory and Applications
article

Eliciting the deserving winner in the presence of enemies

Pablo Amorós
article en

Abstract

Abstract We analyze the problem of a jury that has to select the deserving winner from a group of candidates when (i) the identity of the deserving winner is known to all jurors but not verifiable, (ii) each juror identifies with a different candidate whom they want to favor, and (iii) some jurors may have enemies among the candidates whom they want to harm. We introduce a necessary condition relating to the jurors’ enemies for implementing the deserving winner, called minimal impartiality. The mechanisms proposed in the literature to implement the deserving winner via backward induction fail when jurors have enemies, even though minimal impartiality is satisfied. We propose a simple sequential mechanism that successfully implements the deserving winner via backward induction, whether the jurors have enemies or not, as long as minimal impartiality is satisfied.

Social Choice and WelfareVol. 65(4)
Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Universidad de Málaga, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Auction Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Eliciting the deserving winner in the presence of enemies — Pablo Amorós · Social Choice and Welfare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS