Rejecting an irrelevant singleton in the absence of a competing target

Theories of visual distraction handling commonly propose that mechanisms of distractor rejection are engaged because irrelevant, salient objects tend to dominate the attentional competition with the target. Consequently, the resulting misallocation of attention is thought to trigger distractor suppression, ultimately reducing unwanted attentional capture. Using a modified version of the classic additional-singleton paradigm based on four consecutive displays in each trial, where the target and the distractor competed for attention only in the last one, we demonstrated that the attentional capture elicited by a color singleton was strongly attenuated when the singleton repeatedly appeared within the same trial, even in the absence of a competing target. Importantly, this capture attenuation was not associated with target impairment when the target appeared at the singleton location, suggesting that the within-trial rejection was likely controlled by an expectation-based mechanism rather than a suppressive one. Our findings point to the existence of distinct within-trial and across-trials rejection mechanisms, potentially operating on different timescales and involving suppressive and nonsuppressive processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03069-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rejecting an irrelevant singleton in the absence of a competing target

Luca Betteto, Matteo De Tommaso, Massimo Turatto
3 citations
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
4.29
article

Rejecting an irrelevant singleton in the absence of a competing target

Luca Betteto, Matteo De Tommaso, Massimo Turatto
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Theories of visual distraction handling commonly propose that mechanisms of distractor rejection are engaged because irrelevant, salient objects tend to dominate the attentional competition with the target. Consequently, the resulting misallocation of attention is thought to trigger distractor suppression, ultimately reducing unwanted attentional capture. Using a modified version of the classic additional-singleton paradigm based on four consecutive displays in each trial, where the target and the distractor competed for attention only in the last one, we demonstrated that the attentional capture elicited by a color singleton was strongly attenuated when the singleton repeatedly appeared within the same trial, even in the absence of a competing target. Importantly, this capture attenuation was not associated with target impairment when the target appeared at the singleton location, suggesting that the within-trial rejection was likely controlled by an expectation-based mechanism rather than a suppressive one. Our findings point to the existence of distinct within-trial and across-trials rejection mechanisms, potentially operating on different timescales and involving suppressive and nonsuppressive processes.

Attention Perception & PsychophysicsVol. 87(4)
University of Trento (IT), Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Università degli Studi di Trento
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.