Fear of artificial intelligence or fear of looking in the mirror? Revisiting the Western machine-takeover imaginary

Abstract What do we fear when we fear AI? This paper presents the claim that robophobia is autophobia, the fear of AI is the fear of ourselves, in at least two fashions. First, I frame the question in relation to what I call the Western machine-takeover imaginary, and identify two historical tracks: (1) the fear of non-human autonomy and (2) the logic of the genie. The first track is rooted in the idea of the domination of creations and their possible revolt, a trope that reflects the anthropogenetic narratives that guide Western self-understanding. The second track establishes a link between cultural understanding of non-human, wish-fulfilling others, and modern AI drones and chatbots in terms of potential asymmetries between inputs and outputs, instructions and execution. When biased inputs inform system outputs that inform human inputs in a hermeneutical circle, the outputs we fear cannot be separated from the inputs we generate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02355-1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fear of artificial intelligence or fear of looking in the mirror? Revisiting the Western machine-takeover imaginary

Niels Wilde
3 citations
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

Fear of artificial intelligence or fear of looking in the mirror? Revisiting the Western machine-takeover imaginary

Niels Wilde
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract What do we fear when we fear AI? This paper presents the claim that robophobia is autophobia, the fear of AI is the fear of ourselves, in at least two fashions. First, I frame the question in relation to what I call the Western machine-takeover imaginary, and identify two historical tracks: (1) the fear of non-human autonomy and (2) the logic of the genie. The first track is rooted in the idea of the domination of creations and their possible revolt, a trope that reflects the anthropogenetic narratives that guide Western self-understanding. The second track establishes a link between cultural understanding of non-human, wish-fulfilling others, and modern AI drones and chatbots in terms of potential asymmetries between inputs and outputs, instructions and execution. When biased inputs inform system outputs that inform human inputs in a hermeneutical circle, the outputs we fear cannot be separated from the inputs we generate.

AI & SocietyVol. 40(7)
Aarhus University (DK)
Aarhus Universitet, Carlsbergfondet
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.