Über jeden Zweifel erhaben – Feststellung von Völker- gewohnheitsrecht in der BGH-Rechtsprechung zur funktionellen Immunität ausländischer Staatsbediensteter

The Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) identified an exception to functional immunity for certain war crimes under customary international law in 2021 and extended it to all crimes under international law in 2024. The German legislator codified this case law in sec. 20(2), second sentence of the Courts Constitution Act (GVG). However, this case law raises international and constitutional law concerns. Applying a stringent methodology reveals objectively serious doubts about the identified customary rules. Therefore, the FCJ violated its constitutional obligation of referral to the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) under art. 100(2) of the Basic Law (GG) in these decisions. A decision by the FCC on the controversial immunity exceptions may remedy the deficient customary international law reasoning of the FCJ’s jurisprudence and its statutory codification. This could enhance the legitimacy of the prosecution of crimes under international law in Germany and its potential contribution to the development of customary international law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2025-1-199
Primary Topic
EU Law and Policy Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Über jeden Zweifel erhaben – Feststellung von Völker- gewohnheitsrecht in der BGH-Rechtsprechung zur funktionellen Immunität ausländischer Staatsbediensteter

Isabel Walther
Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International Law
EU Law and Policy Analysis
article

Über jeden Zweifel erhaben – Feststellung von Völker- gewohnheitsrecht in der BGH-Rechtsprechung zur funktionellen Immunität ausländischer Staatsbediensteter

Isabel Walther
article en

Abstract

The Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) identified an exception to functional immunity for certain war crimes under customary international law in 2021 and extended it to all crimes under international law in 2024. The German legislator codified this case law in sec. 20(2), second sentence of the Courts Constitution Act (GVG). However, this case law raises international and constitutional law concerns. Applying a stringent methodology reveals objectively serious doubts about the identified customary rules. Therefore, the FCJ violated its constitutional obligation of referral to the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) under art. 100(2) of the Basic Law (GG) in these decisions. A decision by the FCC on the controversial immunity exceptions may remedy the deficient customary international law reasoning of the FCJ’s jurisprudence and its statutory codification. This could enhance the legitimacy of the prosecution of crimes under international law in Germany and its potential contribution to the development of customary international law.

Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht / Heidelberg Journal of International LawVol. 85(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
EU Law and Policy Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.