EVALUATION OF THE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX OF OECD COUNTRIES BASED ON HYBRID MCDM METHODS

This study aims to assess the logistics performance index (LPI) of OECD countries using the integrated MCDM methods. For this investigation, the data was obtained from the “Connecting to Compete 2023 - LPI” report. At first, the weight of criteria was determined by several methods such as SD, CRITIC, LOPCOW and MEREC. Then, criteria weights obtained from different methods were combined with the Aggregate Weighting Method (AWM). The LPI of OECD countries were ranked using the CRADIS method. The results of the AWM showed that tracking and tracing, and logistics competence and quality were the most and least important criteria, respectively. The results of the CRADIS method revealed that Finland was the best-ranked logistics performance, while Costa Rica was the worst-ranked logistics performance in the OECD countries. Additionally, the robustness and validity of the proposed model was tested by sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.1469898
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION OF THE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX OF OECD COUNTRIES BASED ON HYBRID MCDM METHODS

Emre Kadir Özekenci
8 citations
Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
16.85
article

EVALUATION OF THE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX OF OECD COUNTRIES BASED ON HYBRID MCDM METHODS

Emre Kadir Özekenci
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This study aims to assess the logistics performance index (LPI) of OECD countries using the integrated MCDM methods. For this investigation, the data was obtained from the “Connecting to Compete 2023 - LPI” report. At first, the weight of criteria was determined by several methods such as SD, CRITIC, LOPCOW and MEREC. Then, criteria weights obtained from different methods were combined with the Aggregate Weighting Method (AWM). The LPI of OECD countries were ranked using the CRADIS method. The results of the AWM showed that tracking and tracing, and logistics competence and quality were the most and least important criteria, respectively. The results of the CRADIS method revealed that Finland was the best-ranked logistics performance, while Costa Rica was the worst-ranked logistics performance in the OECD countries. Additionally, the robustness and validity of the proposed model was tested by sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis.

Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler DergisiVol. 47(1)
Çağ University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
16.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.