The Resolution of Corruption Crimes with Connectivity Following the Constitutional Court Decision

The resolution of corruption offenses related to connectivity, following the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 88/PUU-XXI/2023, requires careful scrutiny due to significant changes in case management mechanisms. Previously, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) lacked jurisdiction over connectivity-related corruption cases; however, this ruling has granted it the authority to handle such matters. This research adopts a normative legal approach, utilizing both legislative and conceptual frameworks to examine the issue. Despite the ruling, the handling of connectivity-related offenses—including investigation, prosecution, and adjudication—remains misaligned with existing Indonesian legal frameworks. Currently, case management in this domain involves the Ministry of Defense, the Attorney General's Office, and the Headquarters of the Indonesian National Armed Forces through a permanent connectivity team. This team was established under the Joint Decision of the Minister of Defense Number: 2196/M/XII/2021, the Attorney General Number: 270 of 2021, and the Indonesian National Armed Forces Commander Number: Kep/1135/XII/2021, dated December 7, 2021. However, this decision does not yet integrate the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) or the National Police (Indonesian Police). As a result, if the KPK or the Police handle connectivity-related corruption cases, they must be processed separately (splitting), potentially leading to inconsistencies, inefficiencies, and accountability gaps in law enforcement. Such fragmentation could damage public trust in the justice system and negatively impact the reputation of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. If left unaddressed, these inefficiencies may lead to substantial financial losses for the state. The ruling introduces a shift in operational frameworks, emphasizing a collaborative decision-making process involving all relevant institutions, with careful consideration of military concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.5831
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Resolution of Corruption Crimes with Connectivity Following the Constitutional Court Decision

Bambang Ariyanto, Budi Pramono
Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Corruption and Economic Development
article

The Resolution of Corruption Crimes with Connectivity Following the Constitutional Court Decision

Bambang Ariyanto, Budi Pramono
article en

Abstract

The resolution of corruption offenses related to connectivity, following the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 88/PUU-XXI/2023, requires careful scrutiny due to significant changes in case management mechanisms. Previously, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) lacked jurisdiction over connectivity-related corruption cases; however, this ruling has granted it the authority to handle such matters. This research adopts a normative legal approach, utilizing both legislative and conceptual frameworks to examine the issue. Despite the ruling, the handling of connectivity-related offenses—including investigation, prosecution, and adjudication—remains misaligned with existing Indonesian legal frameworks. Currently, case management in this domain involves the Ministry of Defense, the Attorney General's Office, and the Headquarters of the Indonesian National Armed Forces through a permanent connectivity team. This team was established under the Joint Decision of the Minister of Defense Number: 2196/M/XII/2021, the Attorney General Number: 270 of 2021, and the Indonesian National Armed Forces Commander Number: Kep/1135/XII/2021, dated December 7, 2021. However, this decision does not yet integrate the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) or the National Police (Indonesian Police). As a result, if the KPK or the Police handle connectivity-related corruption cases, they must be processed separately (splitting), potentially leading to inconsistencies, inefficiencies, and accountability gaps in law enforcement. Such fragmentation could damage public trust in the justice system and negatively impact the reputation of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. If left unaddressed, these inefficiencies may lead to substantial financial losses for the state. The ruling introduces a shift in operational frameworks, emphasizing a collaborative decision-making process involving all relevant institutions, with careful consideration of military concerns.

Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian HukumVol. 24(1)
Universitas Hang Tuah (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Resolution of Corruption Crimes with Connectivity Following the Constitutional Court Decision — Bambang Ariyanto, Budi Pramono · Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS