Minimal Clinically Important Differences in CAPE-V Auditory–Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality

This study represents the first known attempt to establish MDC and MCID thresholds for auditory-perceptual ratings of voice quality. The thresholds provide guidance for determining whether real and meaningful changes in voice quality have occurred in patients undergoing treatment for phonotraumatic voice disorders. Future research should explore these values across various voice disorder populations and severity levels and incorporate patient-reported outcomes as anchors to enhance clinical decision making and treatment outcomes in voice rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_jslhr-24-00503
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimal Clinically Important Differences in CAPE-V Auditory–Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality

Laura E. Toles, Kaila L. Stipancic, Julianna C. Smeltzer
3 citations
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Voice and Speech Disorders
3.49
article

Minimal Clinically Important Differences in CAPE-V Auditory–Perceptual Ratings of Voice Quality

Laura E. Toles, Kaila L. Stipancic, Julianna C. Smeltzer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study represents the first known attempt to establish MDC and MCID thresholds for auditory-perceptual ratings of voice quality. The thresholds provide guidance for determining whether real and meaningful changes in voice quality have occurred in patients undergoing treatment for phonotraumatic voice disorders. Future research should explore these values across various voice disorder populations and severity levels and incorporate patient-reported outcomes as anchors to enhance clinical decision making and treatment outcomes in voice rehabilitation.

Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchVol. 68(05)
The University of Texas at Dallas (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Voice and Speech Disorders
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.