Comparative constructions in the Khakass language (a case study of proverbs and sayings)

The comparative system of the Khakass language includes structures denoting comparative relations. Comparative constructions express the idea of choice and preference between two events. In the Khakass language, the comparative relations between two events are quite widely represented in proverbial constructions. Comparative relationships in Khakass proverbs and sayings are formalized through the use of the adverbial form on =ganҷa, the initial case form (=dan), the evaluative comparative of the arty “better.” Also, the service word gender “to be” in the form of the future tense (=ar) in combination with the name in the original case is used, correlative pairs heidi – idӧk “as – also,” hai sin – anӌoh, “how much ‒ as much” by whom – ol “who – that,” ninҷe – anҷa “how much – so much,” and haydag – andag “what ‒ such.” In the adverbial constructions of two possible situations, the situation in the main part is evaluated as preferable. The main predicate of the adverbial construction is expressed in the form of the infinitive, indicative, and imperative. The adverbial construction with the word arty “better” is evaluative. In the comparative-gradation construction, the main event does not replace the event of the dependent part. The predicate of the main part is expressed in the form of an indicative and the presence of an amplifying particle taa is mandatory. Pronominalcomparative constructions demonstrate feature congruence between subordinate and main parts. The equivalence of signs in Khakass proverbs is indicated through a variety of pronominal-comparative words.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25205/2312-6337-2025-1-47-56
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative constructions in the Khakass language (a case study of proverbs and sayings)

А.Н. Чугунекова
Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
article

Comparative constructions in the Khakass language (a case study of proverbs and sayings)

А.Н. Чугунекова
article en

Abstract

The comparative system of the Khakass language includes structures denoting comparative relations. Comparative constructions express the idea of choice and preference between two events. In the Khakass language, the comparative relations between two events are quite widely represented in proverbial constructions. Comparative relationships in Khakass proverbs and sayings are formalized through the use of the adverbial form on =ganҷa, the initial case form (=dan), the evaluative comparative of the arty “better.” Also, the service word gender “to be” in the form of the future tense (=ar) in combination with the name in the original case is used, correlative pairs heidi – idӧk “as – also,” hai sin – anӌoh, “how much ‒ as much” by whom – ol “who – that,” ninҷe – anҷa “how much – so much,” and haydag – andag “what ‒ such.” In the adverbial constructions of two possible situations, the situation in the main part is evaluated as preferable. The main predicate of the adverbial construction is expressed in the form of the infinitive, indicative, and imperative. The adverbial construction with the word arty “better” is evaluative. In the comparative-gradation construction, the main event does not replace the event of the dependent part. The predicate of the main part is expressed in the form of an indicative and the presence of an amplifying particle taa is mandatory. Pronominalcomparative constructions demonstrate feature congruence between subordinate and main parts. The equivalence of signs in Khakass proverbs is indicated through a variety of pronominal-comparative words.

Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia(53)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.