“Laughter” or “Tears”? (On the question of details in Thomas Mann's “Doctor Faustus”)

The clarification of the functions of the marginal details is important for complex themes and motifs of Thomas Mann's “Doctor Faustus”. We consider two details – 'laughter' and 'tears' – in the context of the strings of words that run throughout the text space of “Doctor Faustus”. Adrian Leverkühn's “laughing” in its basic meaning points to the loneliness of the individual, to the isolation of man from the rest of the world and to the closedness within himself. “Tears” have been used throughout human history, and particularly in the Christian religion, as a symbol of mourning, repentance, and catharsis. In the novel, the tear detail serves as a counterweight to evil and cruelty, and consequently signifies the victory of good over evil, of the genuinely human over the inhuman, the satanic. In this meaning, the teardrop detail is contrasted with the leitmotif detail “of laughter”. On this basis, one can state that in the text under study there is an antithesis of evil and good, represented in the novel by two leitmotif details: “Laughter” “Tears”. The purpose of this article is to consider these two details from the point of view of their word series in their interaction, to develop points of contact between the named word series and their penetration into each other. We trace the joint movement of the word-row details “laughter” and “tears” throughout the text, infer their meaning in the main character's life, and determine the frequency of their use in the text. We limit ourselves to individual sections in the text. Quantitatively, laughing details dominate very strongly, but towards the end the tearing details already predominate. The crux of the matter is that the string of words ends with a teardrop detail. In summary, it can be said that at the end of the work Adrian Leverkühn is no longer laughing, he is crying. So here is the triumph of good over evil. Adrian Leverkühn moves away from the devil and approaches the God.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62119/icla.3.8950
Primary Topic
German Literature and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Laughter” or “Tears”? (On the question of details in Thomas Mann's “Doctor Faustus”)

Nino Kvirikadze
German Literature and Culture Studies
article

“Laughter” or “Tears”? (On the question of details in Thomas Mann's “Doctor Faustus”)

Nino Kvirikadze
article en

Abstract

The clarification of the functions of the marginal details is important for complex themes and motifs of Thomas Mann's “Doctor Faustus”. We consider two details – 'laughter' and 'tears' – in the context of the strings of words that run throughout the text space of “Doctor Faustus”. Adrian Leverkühn's “laughing” in its basic meaning points to the loneliness of the individual, to the isolation of man from the rest of the world and to the closedness within himself. “Tears” have been used throughout human history, and particularly in the Christian religion, as a symbol of mourning, repentance, and catharsis. In the novel, the tear detail serves as a counterweight to evil and cruelty, and consequently signifies the victory of good over evil, of the genuinely human over the inhuman, the satanic. In this meaning, the teardrop detail is contrasted with the leitmotif detail “of laughter”. On this basis, one can state that in the text under study there is an antithesis of evil and good, represented in the novel by two leitmotif details: “Laughter” “Tears”. The purpose of this article is to consider these two details from the point of view of their word series in their interaction, to develop points of contact between the named word series and their penetration into each other. We trace the joint movement of the word-row details “laughter” and “tears” throughout the text, infer their meaning in the main character's life, and determine the frequency of their use in the text. We limit ourselves to individual sections in the text. Quantitatively, laughing details dominate very strongly, but towards the end the tearing details already predominate. The crux of the matter is that the string of words ends with a teardrop detail. In summary, it can be said that at the end of the work Adrian Leverkühn is no longer laughing, he is crying. So here is the triumph of good over evil. Adrian Leverkühn moves away from the devil and approaches the God.

Akaki Tsereteli State University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
German Literature and Culture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Laughter” or “Tears”? (On the question of details in Thomas Mann's “Doctor Faustus”) — Nino Kvirikadze · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS