Investigation of the rational use of teicoplanin in inpatient wards of teaching hospitals in Birjand, Iran, from 2022 to 2023

Background and Aims: Incorrect and excessive use of antibiotics has led to a significant rise in drug resistance.Nowadays, irrational antibiotic use is a major contributor to increased illness, death, and healthcare costs.Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the pattern of Teicoplanin use in hospitalized patients at teaching hospitals in Birjand, Iran, from 2022 to 2023. Materials and Methods:This descriptive cross-sectional study based on hospital data was conducted on all patients hospitalized in the wards of Vali-Asr, Imam Reza, and Razi teaching hospitals in 2022 and 2023 who were prescribed Teicoplanin.In this study, all the information required by the patients was recorded in Excel based on the study objectives, as well as the global protocols of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA(, and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists )ASHP ( .Finally, the results were analyzed using the SPSS (version 26) software. Results:The study included 73 patients with a mean age of 64.2617.90years; 37 (51%) were women.The most common clinical conditions leading to Teicoplanin administration were pneumonia (73%) and sepsis (32.9%).According to the results, 87.7% of Teicoplanin treatments were based on antibiogram test results, while only nine patients (12.3%) received empirical Teicoplanin treatment.In 11% of cases, the loading dose of Teicoplanin was correctly administered.Additionally, the maintenance dose was correctly administered in 54 patients (74%).In addition, adverse drug reactions to Teicoplanin were observed in 12 patients (16.4%).The results revealed that 67 patients (91.8%) were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).According to the researcher-developed checklist, only four patients (5.4%) adhered to all protocol guidelines. Conclusion:According to the findings, the patterns of rational Teicoplanin prescription in the studied hospitals do not sufficiently align with existing guidelines and standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sālnāmah va āmār.
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61186/jbums.31.4.293
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of the rational use of teicoplanin in inpatient wards of teaching hospitals in Birjand, Iran, from 2022 to 2023

Effat Alemzadeh, Motahareh Mahi‐Birjand, Saeed Jalalian, Soudabe Es'haghi
Sālnāmah va āmār.
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Investigation of the rational use of teicoplanin in inpatient wards of teaching hospitals in Birjand, Iran, from 2022 to 2023

Effat Alemzadeh, Motahareh Mahi‐Birjand, Saeed Jalalian, Soudabe Es'haghi
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Incorrect and excessive use of antibiotics has led to a significant rise in drug resistance.Nowadays, irrational antibiotic use is a major contributor to increased illness, death, and healthcare costs.Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the pattern of Teicoplanin use in hospitalized patients at teaching hospitals in Birjand, Iran, from 2022 to 2023. Materials and Methods:This descriptive cross-sectional study based on hospital data was conducted on all patients hospitalized in the wards of Vali-Asr, Imam Reza, and Razi teaching hospitals in 2022 and 2023 who were prescribed Teicoplanin.In this study, all the information required by the patients was recorded in Excel based on the study objectives, as well as the global protocols of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA(, and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists )ASHP ( .Finally, the results were analyzed using the SPSS (version 26) software. Results:The study included 73 patients with a mean age of 64.2617.90years; 37 (51%) were women.The most common clinical conditions leading to Teicoplanin administration were pneumonia (73%) and sepsis (32.9%).According to the results, 87.7% of Teicoplanin treatments were based on antibiogram test results, while only nine patients (12.3%) received empirical Teicoplanin treatment.In 11% of cases, the loading dose of Teicoplanin was correctly administered.Additionally, the maintenance dose was correctly administered in 54 patients (74%).In addition, adverse drug reactions to Teicoplanin were observed in 12 patients (16.4%).The results revealed that 67 patients (91.8%) were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).According to the researcher-developed checklist, only four patients (5.4%) adhered to all protocol guidelines. Conclusion:According to the findings, the patterns of rational Teicoplanin prescription in the studied hospitals do not sufficiently align with existing guidelines and standards.

Sālnāmah va āmār.Vol. 31(4)
Birjand University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.