Demand- and supply-side perspectives on parental support: Inequalities between and within families

Current generations of adult children are believed to rely on their parents for more extended periods of their lives than in the past. Theories of parental transfers to adult children often rely on the logic of demand and supply to explain inequality of support within and between families. The current paper examines these notions using an improved research design for understanding variations in four support dimensions: practical, financial, informational, and grandparenting. Random and fixed-effects regression models were estimated on a sample of 16,603 children aged 18–50 nested in 7826 parents in the Netherlands. Findings reveal that support transfers to children strongly depend on parents’ resources and time constraints, confirming the role of supply. Models for sibling differences within families show that parents allocate more support to children with personal problems and children who experienced adverse life events, in line with the notion of demand. Supply and demand-side factors play a weaker role for stepparents but similar roles for married and separated parents. Supply-side effects increase inequality in future generations, whereas demand-side effects reduce inequality by mitigating differences within families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Research
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103181
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demand- and supply-side perspectives on parental support: Inequalities between and within families

Matthijs Kalmijn
1 links
Social Science Research
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Demand- and supply-side perspectives on parental support: Inequalities between and within families

Matthijs Kalmijn
article en

Abstract

Current generations of adult children are believed to rely on their parents for more extended periods of their lives than in the past. Theories of parental transfers to adult children often rely on the logic of demand and supply to explain inequality of support within and between families. The current paper examines these notions using an improved research design for understanding variations in four support dimensions: practical, financial, informational, and grandparenting. Random and fixed-effects regression models were estimated on a sample of 16,603 children aged 18–50 nested in 7826 parents in the Netherlands. Findings reveal that support transfers to children strongly depend on parents’ resources and time constraints, confirming the role of supply. Models for sibling differences within families show that parents allocate more support to children with personal problems and children who experienced adverse life events, in line with the notion of demand. Supply and demand-side factors play a weaker role for stepparents but similar roles for married and separated parents. Supply-side effects increase inequality in future generations, whereas demand-side effects reduce inequality by mitigating differences within families.

Social Science ResearchVol. 129
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Max-Planck-Institut für demografische Forschung, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, European Research Council, H2020 European Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.