A bid for sustainability from the digital platform: an institutional work perspective

Purpose Digital platforms and sustainability are two growing trends associated with organisational innovation and change. However, little emphasis has been placed on exploring how digital platforms can lead to the development of sustainability practices. This paper argues that different classes of sustainability can emerge from platforms in the form of institutional work whose legitimacy derives from judgments of value aimed at solving sustainability problems. This paper aims to identify the forms of institutional work proposed by different platform models that emphasise sustainability. Design/methodology/approach Based on a theoretical process model to depict the nexus between digital platforms and sustainability and a documentary examination of 153 digital platform ventures that claim sustainability solutions, this research uses qualitative comparative analysis to derive combinations of causal conditions to explain the scope of sustainability (form of institutional work) from types of platform solutions. Qualitatively, this paper derives patterns, iterating between data and the literature to validate the model. Findings The findings highlight the role of platforms’ information provision and persuasion techniques in advancing a sustainable digital inclusion agenda, which can have different forms of influence on organisational culture, business processes, performance metrics, supply chain practices and communication language. In particular, the provision of feedback on business sustainability can trigger new organisational processes and metrics, while the persuasion techniques embedded in some platforms’ business models have the potential to change practices at the value chain level in the face of persistent digital rebound effects. Originality/value While the effectiveness of such solutions could be called into question, the intended influence of platforms on businesses provides valuable stepping stones towards the prospect of more effective digital sustainability outcomes, with implications for the digitalisation-sustainability nexus, its theory and practice. Beyond the types of value that platforms can provide, this research has shown that many types of business models can unlock different forms of sustainability, challenging the dichotomy that prevails between market and alternative forms of value.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovation Science
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-06-2024-0165
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A bid for sustainability from the digital platform: an institutional work perspective

Guillermo J. Larios-Hernández
2 citations
International Journal of Innovation Science
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.52
article

A bid for sustainability from the digital platform: an institutional work perspective

Guillermo J. Larios-Hernández
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose Digital platforms and sustainability are two growing trends associated with organisational innovation and change. However, little emphasis has been placed on exploring how digital platforms can lead to the development of sustainability practices. This paper argues that different classes of sustainability can emerge from platforms in the form of institutional work whose legitimacy derives from judgments of value aimed at solving sustainability problems. This paper aims to identify the forms of institutional work proposed by different platform models that emphasise sustainability. Design/methodology/approach Based on a theoretical process model to depict the nexus between digital platforms and sustainability and a documentary examination of 153 digital platform ventures that claim sustainability solutions, this research uses qualitative comparative analysis to derive combinations of causal conditions to explain the scope of sustainability (form of institutional work) from types of platform solutions. Qualitatively, this paper derives patterns, iterating between data and the literature to validate the model. Findings The findings highlight the role of platforms’ information provision and persuasion techniques in advancing a sustainable digital inclusion agenda, which can have different forms of influence on organisational culture, business processes, performance metrics, supply chain practices and communication language. In particular, the provision of feedback on business sustainability can trigger new organisational processes and metrics, while the persuasion techniques embedded in some platforms’ business models have the potential to change practices at the value chain level in the face of persistent digital rebound effects. Originality/value While the effectiveness of such solutions could be called into question, the intended influence of platforms on businesses provides valuable stepping stones towards the prospect of more effective digital sustainability outcomes, with implications for the digitalisation-sustainability nexus, its theory and practice. Beyond the types of value that platforms can provide, this research has shown that many types of business models can unlock different forms of sustainability, challenging the dichotomy that prevails between market and alternative forms of value.

International Journal of Innovation Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.