Approaching the Archipelago in-between: Archipelagicity, Scale and Comparativism

This essay proposes a conceptual reading of the archipelagic applied to three different objects: The Song of Songs ; Gilles Deleuze’s Desert Islands, and Christo and Jeanne-Claude’s large-scale installation Surrounded Islands, analyzing them through the lens of the comparativist method. We will demonstrate how specific modes of reading the fluid spaces in-between the constitutive elements of these works and their respective compound forms can be transversely applied. Our attention will focus primarily on the nature of the archipelagic, which we will understand to be fragmentary, contingent and fluid. By thinking with the archipelago, we will question the mechanics by which the archipelagic facilitates mediation between different intra and extra-textual dimensions, effectively changing the scales at which reading occurs, fluidly, in the viscous spaces between what is social and what is geological.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62119/icla.3.8914
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approaching the Archipelago in-between: Archipelagicity, Scale and Comparativism

Filipe Marques
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
article

Approaching the Archipelago in-between: Archipelagicity, Scale and Comparativism

Filipe Marques
article en

Abstract

This essay proposes a conceptual reading of the archipelagic applied to three different objects: The Song of Songs ; Gilles Deleuze’s Desert Islands, and Christo and Jeanne-Claude’s large-scale installation Surrounded Islands, analyzing them through the lens of the comparativist method. We will demonstrate how specific modes of reading the fluid spaces in-between the constitutive elements of these works and their respective compound forms can be transversely applied. Our attention will focus primarily on the nature of the archipelagic, which we will understand to be fragmentary, contingent and fluid. By thinking with the archipelago, we will question the mechanics by which the archipelagic facilitates mediation between different intra and extra-textual dimensions, effectively changing the scales at which reading occurs, fluidly, in the viscous spaces between what is social and what is geological.

University of Lisbon (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.