The 1960s as a Landmark of Ukrainian Literary Emancipation (American and French Comparative Aspects)

The term “global sixtieth” has persisted in historiography since the 2000s denoting the revolutionary movements united by common discontent with the political, socioeconomic, and cultural status quo. Although their national literary manifestations differed, they appear to be interconnected regarding the attempts to establish other political and aesthetical orders, hence counterculture. This comparative article explores the liberation effect of the counterculture of the 1960s manifested in Ukrainian literature contrasted to American and French. It is stated the former pursued double emancipation – from the imposed ideological system, and centuries of national oppression – through popular poetry. In the Free Bloc of ostentatious civil liberty, the 1960s literature is marked as aesthetically and ideologically modernized. American literature expands towards the colonized voices (Black Arts Movement), the gender spectrum (B. Friedan, S. Plath, G. Greer), and the anti-establishment alternatives (Ken Kesey, R. Brautigan, T. Wolfe). A European counterpart is represented by avant-garde tendencies (Tel Quel, Oulipo, Le théâtre de l'absurde) complemented by feminist and postcolonial as well (écriture féminine, Afropessimism, Négritude reinterpretations). Such “erotics of art” advanced countercultural opposition to the dominant faith and ultimate values of the pre-revolutionary era. In socialistic Ukraine, deprived of the freedom of speech and direct action, the literature field becomes a battlefield for evasive political maneuvering. Instead of introducing new trends, as in the case of the USA and France, the countercultural gesture of Ukrainian “sixtiers” (Mykola Vingranovskiy, Lina Kostenko, Vasyl Symonenko, and more) was to turn to the classic and modernist Ukrainian heritage to revive its threatened discourse. They promoted engaging genres such as lyric poetry and romance, approaching popular leitmotifs as national self-awareness and personal values – themes, deafened under the totalitarian reign of the USSR. By virtue of popular poetry, the sixtiers did a “museum work” of resuscitating Ukrainian identity and preserving it for the next generations. Thus, paradoxically, the Ukrainian counterculture of the 1960s was regressive aesthetically, but pivotal politically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62119/icla.3.8956
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 1960s as a Landmark of Ukrainian Literary Emancipation (American and French Comparative Aspects)

Yuliia Kulish
1 citations
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

The 1960s as a Landmark of Ukrainian Literary Emancipation (American and French Comparative Aspects)

Yuliia Kulish
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The term “global sixtieth” has persisted in historiography since the 2000s denoting the revolutionary movements united by common discontent with the political, socioeconomic, and cultural status quo. Although their national literary manifestations differed, they appear to be interconnected regarding the attempts to establish other political and aesthetical orders, hence counterculture. This comparative article explores the liberation effect of the counterculture of the 1960s manifested in Ukrainian literature contrasted to American and French. It is stated the former pursued double emancipation – from the imposed ideological system, and centuries of national oppression – through popular poetry. In the Free Bloc of ostentatious civil liberty, the 1960s literature is marked as aesthetically and ideologically modernized. American literature expands towards the colonized voices (Black Arts Movement), the gender spectrum (B. Friedan, S. Plath, G. Greer), and the anti-establishment alternatives (Ken Kesey, R. Brautigan, T. Wolfe). A European counterpart is represented by avant-garde tendencies (Tel Quel, Oulipo, Le théâtre de l'absurde) complemented by feminist and postcolonial as well (écriture féminine, Afropessimism, Négritude reinterpretations). Such “erotics of art” advanced countercultural opposition to the dominant faith and ultimate values of the pre-revolutionary era. In socialistic Ukraine, deprived of the freedom of speech and direct action, the literature field becomes a battlefield for evasive political maneuvering. Instead of introducing new trends, as in the case of the USA and France, the countercultural gesture of Ukrainian “sixtiers” (Mykola Vingranovskiy, Lina Kostenko, Vasyl Symonenko, and more) was to turn to the classic and modernist Ukrainian heritage to revive its threatened discourse. They promoted engaging genres such as lyric poetry and romance, approaching popular leitmotifs as national self-awareness and personal values – themes, deafened under the totalitarian reign of the USSR. By virtue of popular poetry, the sixtiers did a “museum work” of resuscitating Ukrainian identity and preserving it for the next generations. Thus, paradoxically, the Ukrainian counterculture of the 1960s was regressive aesthetically, but pivotal politically.

National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.