Prosty język w urzędzie – największe wyzwania. Z czym (nie) radzą sobie twórcy tekstów

The paper aims at pointing out the principles of plain language that are the most and the least effectively implemented in official texts. The author analyses fourteen texts that represent different forms and topics, drafted at the Social Insurance Institution and the National Revenue Administration. The analysis consists in categorizing the texts by specific principles of plain language and evaluating whether a given principle has been applied. Consequently, a collection of about 100 examples has emerged. The article presents selected examples, representing the three pillars of plain language: layout and composition, syntax, and lexis. In the examined examples, most commonly and fully embraced are plain language principles of layout and composition. Yet, the rules regarding syntax and lexis are only partially applied: in these categories the number of simplified and non-simplified examples is similar. This leads to the conclusion that the quality of plain language in official texts is determined by extralinguistic factors. It is not possible to indicate linguistic features that would be implemented in texts much more or less effectively than others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poradnik Językowy
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33896/porj.2025.2.6
Primary Topic
Language and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prosty język w urzędzie – największe wyzwania. Z czym (nie) radzą sobie twórcy tekstów

Ewa Kozioł-Chrzanowska
Poradnik Językowy
Language and Culture
article

Prosty język w urzędzie – największe wyzwania. Z czym (nie) radzą sobie twórcy tekstów

Ewa Kozioł-Chrzanowska
article en

Abstract

The paper aims at pointing out the principles of plain language that are the most and the least effectively implemented in official texts. The author analyses fourteen texts that represent different forms and topics, drafted at the Social Insurance Institution and the National Revenue Administration. The analysis consists in categorizing the texts by specific principles of plain language and evaluating whether a given principle has been applied. Consequently, a collection of about 100 examples has emerged. The article presents selected examples, representing the three pillars of plain language: layout and composition, syntax, and lexis. In the examined examples, most commonly and fully embraced are plain language principles of layout and composition. Yet, the rules regarding syntax and lexis are only partially applied: in these categories the number of simplified and non-simplified examples is similar. This leads to the conclusion that the quality of plain language in official texts is determined by extralinguistic factors. It is not possible to indicate linguistic features that would be implemented in texts much more or less effectively than others.

Poradnik Językowy(2/2025(821))
The Institute of the Polish Language of the Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Language and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.