Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence models GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 in clinical decision-making in sports surgery and physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study
GPT-4 demonstrates superior performance compared to GPT-3.5 in clinical decision-making for sports surgery and physiotherapy. These findings suggest that advanced AI models can aid in diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and rehabilitation strategies. However, AI should function as a decision-support tool rather than a substitute for expert clinical judgment. Future studies should explore the integration of AI into real-world clinical workflows, validate findings using larger datasets, and compare additional AI models beyond the GPT series.
Authors
- Veysel Uludağ (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9911-5961)
- Mehmet Arıcan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0649-2339)
- Zekeriya Okan Karaduman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6719-3666)
- Sönmez Sağlam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-8003)
- Mücahid Osman Yücel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-2367)
- Raşit Emin Dalaslan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-8024)
Institutions
- Düzce Üniversitesi (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Published
- 2025-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02996-8
- Citations
- 11
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.20